Home > Star Trek Chris Pine Movies In Order

Star Trek Chris Pine Movies In Order

  • UPDATED: April 3, 2024

star trek movies with zachary quinto

Table of Contents

Star Trek: Chris Pine Movies in Order

When it comes to the Star Trek franchise, one name that stands out is Chris Pine. The talented actor has portrayed the iconic character of Captain James T. Kirk in the rebooted Star Trek film series. With his charming charisma and impressive acting skills, Pine has won the hearts of both old and new fans of the beloved sci-fi franchise. In this article, we will take a look at the Star Trek movies featuring Chris Pine in chronological order.

1. Star Trek (2009): Directed by J.J. Abrams, this film serves as a reboot of the original Star Trek series. It introduces us to a younger version of Captain Kirk, played by Chris Pine, as he embarks on his journey to become the captain of the USS Enterprise. The movie explores Kirk’s early days at Starfleet Academy and his first encounter with Spock (Zachary Quinto) and the rest of his crew. With its thrilling action sequences and strong character development, this film was a huge success both critically and commercially.

2. Star Trek Into Darkness (2013): The sequel to 2009’s Star Trek, this film once again sees Chris Pine reprising his role as Captain Kirk. Directed by J.J. Abrams, it follows Kirk and his crew as they face a dangerous terrorist named John Harrison (Benedict Cumberbatch). This movie delves deeper into Kirk’s leadership abilities and tests his loyalty to his crewmates. With its intense storyline and stunning visual effects, Star Trek Into Darkness further solidified Pine’s portrayal of Captain Kirk.

3. Star Trek Beyond (2016): Directed by Justin Lin, this third installment in the rebooted series takes the crew of the USS Enterprise on an epic adventure into uncharted territory. Once again, Chris Pine shines as Captain Kirk, leading his crew through various challenges and battles against a formidable enemy named Krall (Idris Elba). This film explores the themes of unity and friendship, while also showcasing Pine’s growth as an actor in his portrayal of Kirk.

Chris Pine’s portrayal of Captain James T. Kirk in the Star Trek movies has been nothing short of exceptional. From his charismatic presence to his ability to capture the essence of the iconic character, Pine has truly made the role his own. Whether you’re a die-hard fan or new to the franchise, these films are a must-watch for any sci-fi enthusiast. So grab some popcorn, sit back, and enjoy Chris Pine’s captivating performances in the thrilling world of Star Trek!

Endante

RELATED TOPICS:

  • star trek chris pine movies in order

guest

Related articles you'll love:

Ash williams movies in order, disney tinkerbell movies in order, what are all the thor movies in order, gods not dead movies in order, what is the thor movies in order, all aliens movies in order, latest articles, o.j. simpson saga – a tale of triumph, tragedy, and controversy, jeremy allan white filmography, jeremy allen white – all you need to know, the boy and the heron ending explained, da’vine joy randolph – all you need to know.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Ad Blocker Enabled!

an image, when javascript is unavailable

‘Star Trek’ Cast, Including Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto, Returning for Fourth Film

By Adam B. Vary

Adam B. Vary

Senior Entertainment Writer

  • Marvel’s ‘The Fantastic Four’ Adds Paul Walter Hauser 6 days ago
  • Why ‘Captain America: Brave New World’ Is the Latest Movie With Tie-In Toys That Reveal Spoilers 6 days ago
  • Jeff Bridges Returning for 'Tron: Ares' 1 week ago

Star Trek Chris Pine Karl Urban Zachary Quinto Simon Pegg

They’re boldly going back.

Paramount is planning to enter negotiations for “ Star Trek ” stars Chris Pine , Zachary Quinto , Zoe Saldana, Karl Urban, John Cho and Simon Pegg to return to the Enterprise for their fourth tour of duty in the venerable sci-fi franchise.

The announcement was made by J.J. Abrams during the Paramount Investors Day Presentation on Feb. 15.

“We are thrilled to say that we are hard at work on a new ‘Star Trek’ film that will be shooting by the end of the year that will be featuring our original cast and some new characters that I think are going to be really fun and exciting and help take ‘Star Trek’ into areas that you’ve just never seen before,” Abrams said. “We’re thrilled about this film, we have a bunch of other stories that we’re talking about that we think will be really exciting, so can’t wait for you to see what we’re cooking up. But until then, live long and prosper.”

The six actors first stepped into their respective iconic roles as Kirk, Spock, Uhura, Bones, Sulu and Scotty in 2009’s “Star Trek,” directed by Abrams, which reset the “Trek” timeline and allowed for the reboot to exist unencumbered from the hundreds of hours of “Trek” continuity that had come before. The actors returned in two sequels, 2013’s “Star Trek Into Darkness,” also directed by Abrams, and 2016’s “Star Trek Beyond,” directed by Justin Lin.

Popular on Variety

Abrams is producing the new, as-yet-untitled film through Bad Robot, with Matt Shakman (“WandaVision”) directing from a screenplay by Josh Friedman (“Avatar 2”) and Cameron Squires (“WandaVision”) based on a earlier draft by Lindsey Beer (“Sierra Burgess Is a Loser”) and Geneva Robertson-Dworet (“Captain Marvel”).

Paramount was close to bringing back this cast once before: In 2018, S.J. Clarkson (“Jessica Jones”) had signed up to direct a sequel that would have reunited Pine’s Kirk with his late father, played by Chris Hemsworth reprising his performance from the 2009 “Star Trek.” That film never materialized, however, after Paramount reportedly couldn’t close a deal with Pine and Hemsworth.

Since then, insiders say the studio has done market research to determine audience interest in the rebooted cast, given the long wait period between “Beyond” — which lost money for Paramount — and a prospective new “Trek” film. Execs determined that there was still lasting audience enthusiasm for Pine, Quinto and the rest of the cast in their established roles, which allowed the studio to feel comfortable with moving forward with bringing them back.

Paramount has also explored several other avenues for “Trek” features, none of which seem to have ultimately borne fruit. Quentin Tarantino reportedly cooled on a “Star Trek” script he was pursuing with “The Revenant” screenwriter Mark L. Smith. In late 2019, Paramount tapped “Fargo” and “Legion” creator Noah Hawley to write and direct a “Trek” movie that Hawley planned to feature new actors playing new characters. But when Emma Watts became president of the Paramount Motion Picture Group a few months later, insiders say she paused all “Trek” development, including Hawley’s film , to decide how best to move forward with one of the studio’s crown jewel franchises. With Watts’ departure from Paramount in September, it’s unclear what the current “Trek” film portends for other development for the franchise, including a screenplay by “Fear the Walking Dead” co-executive producer Kalinda Vazquez .

Bringing the 2009 “Trek” cast back could prove a challenge given they’ve all had busy schedules since “Beyond.” Pine added the “Wonder Woman” franchise to his resume and he’ll next appear in Olivia Wilde’s thriller “Don’t Worry Darling” and the black-ops film “Violence of Action.” Quinto headlined the AMC series “NOS4A2,” and starred in the Broadway revival of “The Boys in the Band” and its 2020 Netflix film adaptation. Saldana continued her run as Gamora in several Marvel Studios films, including “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2” and “Avengers: Endgame”; she’ll star in “Avatar 2” this year and in “Guardians Vol. 3” in 2023. Urban appeared in 2017’s “Thor: Ragnarok” and he’ll continue his performance as Billy Butcher on Season 3 of Amazon’s “The Boys” in June. Cho starred in acclaimed indies “Columbus” and “Searching,” and he starred in Netflix’s live-action adaption of the anime series “Cowboy Bebop.” And Pegg starred with Nick Frost on Amazon’s horror comedy series “Truth Seekers,” and he’ll reprise his role as Benji in “Mission: Impossible 7” in 2023.

One member of the 2009 “Trek” cast, however, sadly cannot join them. Anton Yelchin, who played Chekov, died in an accident in June 2016, a month before “Beyond” opened in theaters. At that film’s premiere at San Diego Comic Con, the cast, filmmakers and invited guests sat in a full minute of silence in tribute to the late actor.

Brent Lang contributed to this story.

More From Our Brands

Kelly clarkson wins key rulings ahead of new trial with ex-husband, this land rover defender 6×6 restomod is a road beast with good manners, jokic joins elite company with third nba mvp award, the best loofahs and body scrubbers, according to dermatologists, peacock’s friday the 13th series loses bryan fuller as showrunner, verify it's you, please log in.

Quantcast

  • Skip to main content
  • Keyboard shortcuts for audio player

Ask Me Another

  • Latest Show
  • Meet Our Guests

Ask Me Another

  • LISTEN & FOLLOW
  • Apple Podcasts
  • Google Podcasts

Your support helps make our show possible and unlocks access to our sponsor-free feed.

Zachary Quinto: Mr. Spock And The Boys In The Band

star trek movies with zachary quinto

Zachary Quinto Chiun Kai Shih/Courtesy of the Artist hide caption

Zachary Quinto

Zachary Quinto is known for playing characters who keep things close to the vest. On the hit NBC show Heroes , he played the insidious serial killer Sylar, and on the AMC series NOS4A2 , he plays Charlie Manx, an immortal creature who feeds on the souls of children. As Mr. Spock in J.J. Abrams' Star Trek , he was tasked with maintaining the legacy of Leonard Nimoy's stoic character. Quinto and Nimoy worked together on the film and developed a close friendship.

In 2018, Quinto joined the cast of the Tony-winning Broadway revival of The Boys in the Band. The play broke ground half a century ago for its portrayal of gay life at a time when homosexuality was scarcely spoken about openly on stage. Now, the play has been adapted for a film on Netflix, starring Quinto, Jim Parsons, Matt Bomer and Andrew Rannells, all openly gay actors.

As a native Pittsburgher, he grew up with a bit of a regional accent, before he went to Carnegie Mellon to study acting. We put Quinto's knowledge of other famous Pittsburghers to the test with a game about celebrities who hail from the Steel City. (Had this been a two-player game we could have said the contestants were "Pitt" against each other, but you gotta play the hand you're dealt.)

INTERVIEW HIGHLIGHTS

On being an amateur banjo player in his spare time:

I've been playing for about seven years. My brother bought me a banjo for Christmas one year, this was probably ten, eleven years ago, and it handsomely decorated my living room by leaning against the wall, and I never picked it up. And then, taught myself via, you know, the internet, and then found a teacher in Los Angeles. I usually find a teacher wherever I go, like if I'm working on location, I look up a local teacher and work with somebody for the time that I'm there.

On keeping his Spock ears:

Quinto Turns Inward To Find Spock's Soul

Movie Interviews

Quinto turns inward to find spock's soul.

( On Wait Wait Don't Tell Me in 2008 , Leonard Nimoy revealed that he kept a pair of Mr. Spock's pointy ears as a keepsake from his work on Star Trek. Turns out, Zachary Quinto did the same thing.)

I have a few pairs of ears. I think it's probably in the ballpark of a dozen, because we've made three films now, and it was a new pair of ears every day on the movie. So, you know, it's not like they were going to miss them. And at the end of the day, they just cut them, they just shredded them and threw them away. It's not like anybody, so I was like, "Yeah I can just keep a couple of those."

On playing Harold in The Boys in the Band , who was based on playwright Mart Crowley's best friend:

It is based on a real-life man named Howard Jeffrey who was a very successful choreographer and dancer in New York, and was Mart Crowley's best frenemy. They had a very volatile but intimate friendship, and many of the interactions between Michael and Harold in the play and film are directly lifted from the relationship between Mart and Howard in real-life, which I loved. It's not my nature to have such a vitriolic relationship with anybody, let alone somebody that I love and care about. And so it really kind of helped me wrap my mind around how they could be so vile toward one another in one breath, and then so unwaveringly committed to one another in the next breath.

On his dog barking during the Zoom call:

River, there's no need. We're having a very civilized conversation. I appreciate your alertness.

Heard on: Zachary Quinto: Spock-tober.

Advertisement

Supported by

Movie Review | 'Star Trek'

A Franchise Goes Boldly Backward

  • Share full article

star trek movies with zachary quinto

By Manohla Dargis

  • May 7, 2009

A bright, shiny blast from a newly imagined past, “Star Trek,” the latest spinoff from the influential television show, isn’t just a pleasurable rethink of your geek uncle’s favorite science-fiction series. It’s also a testament to television’s power as mythmaker, as a source for some of the fundamental stories we tell about ourselves, who we are and where we came from. The famous captain (William Shatner, bless his loony lights) and creator (Gene Roddenberry, rest in peace) may no longer be on board, but the spirit of adventure and embrace of rationality that define the show are in full swing, as are the chicks in minis and kicky boots.

Initially appearing in 1966, the original “Star Trek” is a utopian fantasy of the first order, a vision of the enlightened future in which whites, blacks, Asians and one poker-faced Vulcan are united by their exploratory mission (“to boldly go”), a prime directive (no intervention) and the occasional dust-up. An origin story directed with a sure touch and perfect tone by J. J. Abrams, the fully loaded film — a showcase for big-studio hardware, software, muscled boys who can act and leggy girls who aren’t required to — turns back the narrative clock to the moment before the main characters first assembled on the deck of the U.S.S. Enterprise, a sleek spacecraft that invariably sails into intergalactic storms. Even utopia needs a little bang.

Apparently so do franchise reboots, which explains why the movie opens with a loud, somewhat chaotic scene filled with fireballs, airborne bodies, heroically clenched male jaws and a squawking pregnant woman about to pop out the future James Tiberius Kirk. Born in space (well, a shuttle craft), Kirk is destined to return to its embracing darkness. (Future “Trek” scholars will be working the Oedipal angle hard.) But this being an origin story, first there’s a peek at a boy (Jimmy Bennett as the young Kirk) tearing down an Iowa highway in a stolen hot rod, a paradigmatic character moment that’s juxtaposed with images of a young brainiac (Jacob Kogan as the wee Spock) problem-solving with intelligence and a few punches.

Kirk and Spock don’t meet in person until they’re adults — now played by Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto — at Starfleet Academy, which, in keeping with the show’s liberal leanings, is in San Francisco. At school Kirk flirts with Uhura (Zoë Saldana), a hot number who coolly brushes him off, and makes friends with a doctor, Leonard McCoy, a k a Bones (Karl Urban, wild-eyed and funny). Kirk also comes smack up against Spock, an officious instructor. In the tradition of many great romances, the two men take almost an instant dislike to each other, an antagonism that literalizes the Western divide between the mind (Spock) and body (Kirk) that gives the story emotional and dramatic force as well as some generous laughs.

Those laughs never slide into mockery. Mr. Abrams doesn’t treat “Star Trek” as a sacred text, which would be deadly for everyone save the fanatics. But neither does he skewer a pop cultural classic that, more than 40 years after its first run, has been so lampooned (it feels like there are more “South Park” parodies than original episodes) it was difficult to see how he was going to give it new life. By design or accident, he has, simply because in its hopefulness “Star Trek” reminds you that there’s more to science fiction (and Hollywood blockbusters) than nihilism. Mr. Abrams doesn’t venture into politics as boldly as Mr. Roddenberry sometimes did, though it’s worth noting he does equate torture with barbarism.

The barbarians here are the Romulans, who at one point in television time used to look a lot like Spock, but here resemble a Maori motorcycle gang complete with facial tattoos and Goth threads. Led by the glowering psychopath Nero (Eric Bana, an actor who knows how to take villainy seriously), the Romulans are mainly on hand to provoke the Starfleet cadets into space. There Mr. Abrams shows off some expensive-looking special effects, including an enemy warship that, with its enormous, grasping tendrils, by turns resembles a monstrous jellyfish and a malignantly blooming flower. The film comes down on the side of hope, but its apocalyptic interludes, including the image of a planet imploding into gray dust, collapsing like a desiccated piece of fruit, linger.

Despite these visions, the flashing lasers and latex aliens, “Star Trek” is fundamentally about two men engaged in a continuing conversation about civilizations and their discontents. Hot and cold, impulsive and tightly controlled, Kirk and Spock need each other to work, a dynamic Mr. Abrams captures with his two well-balanced leads. Mr. Quinto lets you see and hear the struggle between the human and the Vulcan in Spock through the emotions that ripple across his face and periodically throw off his unmodulated phrasing. Mr. Pine has the harder job — he has to invoke Mr. Shatner’s sui generis performance while transcending its excesses — which makes his nuanced interpretation all the more potent. Steering clear of outright imitation, the two instead distill the characters to capture their essence, their Kirk-ness and Spock-ness.

Written by Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman, the story has plenty of chatter, but Mr. Abrams keeps the talk moving, slowing down only intermittently, as when Captain Pike (Bruce Greenwood) or the wryly smiling Leonard Nimoy (!) unload some paternalistic advice on Kirk. A television veteran (“Lost”), Mr. Abrams handles the action scenes better than he did in his only other big-screen outing (“Mission: Impossible III”), largely by not lavishing too much time on them. By far his finest moments take place on the brightly lighted deck of the Enterprise, where against the backdrop of limitless space, Kirk, Spock and the rest of the young crew fumble with roles that — much like the young actors playing them, including Anton Yelchin as Chekov and John Cho as Sulu — they ultimately and rather wonderfully make their own.

“Star Trek” is rated PG-13 (Parents strongly cautioned). Some intense but bloodless action.

Explore More in TV and Movies

Not sure what to watch next we can help..

The Netflix stalker series “ Baby Reindeer ” combines the appeal of a twisty thriller with a deep sense of empathy. The ending illustrates why it’s become such a hit .

We have entered the golden age of Mid TV, where we have a profusion of well-cast, sleekly produced competence, our critic writes .

The writer-director Alex Garland has made it clear that “Civil War” should be a warning. Instead, the ugliness of war comes across as comforting thrills .

Studios obsessively focused on PG-13 franchises and animation in recent years, but movies like “Challengers” and “Saltburn” show that Hollywood is embracing sex again .

If you are overwhelmed by the endless options, don’t despair — we put together the best offerings   on Netflix , Max , Disney+ , Amazon Prime  and Hulu  to make choosing your next binge a little easier.

Sign up for our Watching newsletter  to get recommendations on the best films and TV shows to stream and watch, delivered to your inbox.

an image, when javascript is unavailable

The Definitive Voice of Entertainment News

Subscribe for full access to The Hollywood Reporter

site categories

Zachary quinto on starring in ‘who’s afraid of virginia woolf’ and when the next ‘star trek’ film will happen.

The actor, appearing at The Geffen Playhouse in the Edward Albee classic, says of 'Star Trek', "I hope that we’ll get to assemble the crew one more time."

By Jordan Riefe

Jordan Riefe

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Flipboard
  • Share this article on Email
  • Show additional share options
  • Share this article on Linkedin
  • Share this article on Pinit
  • Share this article on Reddit
  • Share this article on Tumblr
  • Share this article on Whatsapp
  • Share this article on Print
  • Share this article on Comment

Zachary Quinto -

Most moviegoers know him as Mr. Spock in the Star Trek franchise, but Zachary Quinto is first and foremost a theater rat. A nominee and winner of numerous awards for his work in plays like Angels in America , The Glass Menagerie and more recently, The Boys in the Band , he’s now undertaking perhaps his toughest stage role to date — George in the Edward Albee classic, Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?

Opening April 28 at Los Angeles’ Geffen Playhouse , the new production, directed by Gordon Greenberg, also stars Aimee Carrero as Honey, Graham Phillips as her husband, Nick, and Calista Flockhart as George’s besotted wife, Martha.

In the well-known play — which celebrates its 60th anniversary this year — George and Martha spend a drunken evening entertaining Nick and Honey at their home on the campus of a small New England university where both men are professors. As the booze flows and the hours tick by, Nick and Honey bear witness to the drunken hostility that defines their hosts’ marriage. But soon they, too, are pulled into the fray.

Related Stories

William shatner willing to return to 'star trek' as de-aged captain kirk, william shatner on living boldly throughout acting career: "the future is unheralded".

“George is someone who wrestles with a lot of inadequacy. On some levels, I would call it a failed ambition but on other levels, an absent ambition,” Quinto tells The Hollywood Reporter during a break in rehearsals. “There’s left in the balance this kind of contraction that he starts the play with. And part of the way that contraction expands is through the psychological dynamic that he shares with Martha. Something is at stake for them that’s never been at stake before, which is the survival of their marriage, the integrity of it.”

George was believed to have great potential when he married Martha, daughter of the school’s president. In the 23 years since, he has languished, drowning his disappointment in alcohol-fueled bouts with his wife. “There’s a power position George occupies as the man of the house and the bartender of the night. He keeps Martha in the degree of drunkenness she’s grown accustomed to. But the way he manipulates Nick and Honey through how much he serves them — for every drink George has, Nick and Honey have at least two, if not more.”

Quinto, who doesn’t drink, hasn’t bothered himself with the theatrical exigencies of playing drunk. Instead, his focus is on what happens when guardrails fall off, when inebriation teases out unspoken truths. The result is a storm of shouting and tears that defines much of the play.

“My belief is George and Martha very much love one another and are very much meant to survive,” says Quinto. “What’s so masterful about this play, 255 minutes are a knock-about, drag-out affair. But the last five minutes offer a glimpse of forgiveness, tenderness, unification in a way that is a masterful stroke on Albee’s part.”

The playwright’s third play, Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? won a Tony for best play and was selected for the Pulitzer Prize by the drama jury, but was overruled by the organization’s advisory committee which opted not to award a drama prize that year. The 1966 film adaptation was nominated for 13 Oscars and won five, including one for Elizabeth Taylor. If the Pulitzer felt like the one that got away, Albee needn’t have worried. He subsequently won the award three times for A Delicate Balance , Seascape and Three Tall Women .

It could be kismet, but there’s crossover between Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? And Star Trek . No, Spock will not spend the recently announced new installment of the franchise drunkenly stumbling around the bridge of the USS Enterprise. Instead, he will be taking orders from Matt Shakman , artistic director of The Geffen Playhouse, who will direct the new film, with a working title of Star Trek 4 . (It would be the 14th film in the Star Trek franchise.)

But like fellow castmates Chris Pine (Captain Kirk) and Karl Urban (who plays McCoy), Quinto was blindsided by the announcement that the new film aims to shoot by year’s end.

“I don’t know that we will do it this year. I don’t know when it will happen. And I always maintain that I would love to do it,” he says, despite having not yet seen a script, which is being written by Lindsey Beer and Geneva Robertson-Dworet. “But until I get something concrete — ‘We’re shooting this day, here’s your script, get ready’ — I’m in a wait and see pattern. I’m not really attached to it in any way until I have much more definitive certainty that it’s actually happening.”

He went on to note that studio movies of the scale of Star Trek often begin in fits and starts, but he’s confident the film will happen. The property is a key franchise for Paramount, and the studio needs content for theatrical release and its streaming platform, Paramount+.

“There’s so many different platforms for content. And where that content’s coming from and how it’s getting made, and how it fits into people’s schedules and other commitments and stuff is always the hurdle. But I hope that we’ll get to assemble the crew one more time. It’s a great ensemble and we love each other,” he offers. “And I think I can speak for everyone and say we’d love to find a way to come back and do another one.”

THR Newsletters

Sign up for THR news straight to your inbox every day

More from The Hollywood Reporter

Caitlin clark’s official indiana fever jersey with nike has landed — here’s where to buy before it sells out, nobu ryokan malibu extends reputation as ‘relaxing retreat’ with new higherdose partnership, one of dries van noten’s final men’s collections has arrived — these are the exclusives to shop for summer, how to watch all of the ‘planet of the apes’ movies in order online, this masterclass deal for mother’s day lets moms learn from michael lewis, martha stewart, kris jenner and more, seth rogen lights giant bong at hollywood bowl show, joking, “weed’s legal, what am i trying to prove”.

Quantcast

Star Trek home

  • More to Explore
  • Series & Movies

Published Oct 18, 2011

Zachary Quinto Interview, Part 1

star trek movies with zachary quinto

Zachary Quinto has been in the news the past few days. Perhaps you’ve heard: Star Trek (2009) ’s Mr. Spock has a new movie coming out, called Margin Call , and, very quietly, he just came out, announcing to the world that he is a gay man. StarTrek.com caught up with Quinto for an interview a couple of days after the big announcement. Over the course of the conversation, he shared his thoughts on Spock and his hopes for the next feature, as well as whether or not now is the time for a gay character on Star Trek . He also talked about Margin Call , which will open on Friday, his upcoming stint on the series American Horror Story , and previewed other projects in the works from his production company, Before the Door. Below is part one of our exclusive conversation, and visit StarTrek.com again tomorrow to read part two. This is our first time talking to you since the release of Star Trek (2009) . So, how pleased with the finished product were you, and what did you make of the fan and critical response to it? Quinto: Well, for all intents and purposes, Star Trek was my first movie. So I didn’t really have anything to compare it to in terms of scope and scale at the time. It was an incredibly gratifying experience, creatively and professionally and personally, to work on the first movie. And I was really encouraged by the way everyone responded to it when it came out. I have a lot of enthusiasm and excitement about going back into it for the next movie. What did it mean to you to get Leonard Nimoy’s stamp of approval on your casting as Spock? And now, having worked with him on the film and having done several events with him in the past couple of years, what does it mean to you to count him among your friends? Quinto: That’s something I could never have anticipated. I certainly was grateful, going in, for his support. For me as an actor, I’m glad he offered it. I didn’t know how essential it would become to me and I didn’t know how close he and I would become. I just have such admiration and appreciation and respect for him, and it’s a great honor to me that he and I are as close as we are and that we stay in touch as we do. And I just really love him. You just announced publicly that you are gay. Of all people in the world, would you like to think it’s Star Trek fans who will be the most accepting? Quinto: I have been met with nothing but support, from everyone, in the past couple of days since I made that announcement. My Star Trek fans have always been incredibly supportive of everything that I’ve done, and I’m certainly glad to see that that remains the case. I’m just really overwhelmed by and grateful for the unanimous outpouring of love and encouragement from literally all over the world, which I did not anticipate when I made that announcement. I did not imagine what an impact it would have, and from the feedback I’ve gotten, what a positive impact it’s been. You wrote on your blog that it was the suicide of Jamey Rodemeyer, a 15-year-old who committed suicide after being bullied because he was gay, that prompted you to go public. What do you hope will come from your decision? Quinto: We have to change the discourse and we have to let people know that there’s a real spirit of openness and acceptance, and not of judgment and hatred and intolerance. And if me standing up and making this declaration in any way feeds that notion, then I’m even happier to do it. Is it time for a gay character in Star Trek ? Quinto: Oh… I don’t know the answer to that question. Not just for the sake of having one. But if there’s a way to incorporate that aspect of our social structure in a creatively integrous way, then I certainly wouldn’t be opposed to it. But I’m not a big fan of doing anything just for the sake of doing it, so I think there’d have to be a real undercurrent of purpose if that was the case, and I mean creatively, not just politically. Let’s talk about your new film, the financial drama/thriller Margin Call . What did you see in the project that made it worthy of you spending a couple of years on it as both an actor and producer? Quinto: I started a production company three years ago, and this was the first movie we decided to get behind. I felt really drawn into the way the story was written. It really attempts to humanize the characters who inhabit this world at a time that it came crashing down around them. The impact that that had on them was something that was really interesting to me creatively. I didn’t know how much at the time, but there was an element of social relevance to this that made it really appealing. And, in terms of the kinds of movies we want to make at my company, this ticked a lot of those boxes. Then, on top of all that, I met (writer-director) J.C. Chandor, connected with him, and found out how affable and articulate and intelligent he is. That sealed the deal for sure. You had a budget on this of $3.5 million, which is bare bones for a movie, particularly one as loaded with stars as this. How amazed were you that people like Kevin Spacey, Jeremy Irons, Paul Bettany, Penn Badgley, Demi Moore, Simon Baker, Stanley Tucci and Mary McDonnell signed on for it? Quinto: It was pretty incredible, but not surprising. We wouldn’t have set out to make the movie if we didn’t think it’d attract that level of talent. I make this joke that everything that could have gone right with this movie did go right, and realize how anomalous and how unusual that is. To have this be our first film, it was a really remarkable experience, and to have those people you just named join us for this project was a huge part of it. Visit StarTrek.com again tomorrow to read part two of our interview with Zachary Quinto. To visit Quinto’s official site, click HERE .

Get Updates By Email

Zachary Quinto

BERLIN, GERMANY - FEBRUARY 11:  Actor Zachary Quinto attends the 'Margin Call' press conference during day two of the 61st Berlin International Film Festival at the Grand Hyatt on February 11, 2011 in Berlin, Germany.  (Photo by Sean Gallup/Getty Images) *** Local Caption *** Zachary Quinto

Who Is Zachary Quinto?

After the death of his father when Zachary Quinto was 7 years old, he found his passion in acting. Professionally trained in the arts at Carnegie Mellon University, he went on to find work on series such as so noTORIous and Touched by an Angel . He later found fame as Sylar in the supernatural thriller Heroes . He has since taken on the role of Spock in J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek film series, including 2013's Star Trek Into Darkness .

Zachary John Quinto was born on June 2, 1977, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He and his older brother, Joe Quinto, were born to mother Margaret "Margo" Quinto and father John Quinto. In the mid-1980s, when Quinto was 7 years old, his father died of cancer. The loss became one of the major factors in Quinto's ambition to succeed as an actor. He began his acting career a few years later, at the age of 11.

While in Pittsburgh, Quinto performed with the CLO Mini Stars in several local productions, including The Wizard of Oz and Cinderella . His passion for acting continued throughout high school and college, with Quinto studying acting at Carnegie Mellon University. One year after his college graduation in 1999, Quinto moved to California to jump-start his career as a professional actor.

Early Career

In the years following Quinto's move to the West Coast, he found minor television roles, including on the series Touched by an Angel , Lizzie McGuire and Charmed . He landed his first recurring role on a series soon after, appearing as Adam Kaufman on the popular drama 24 beginning in 2003, though this role would end after the series' third season in 2004.

The exposure from his recurring part on 24 paid off for Quinto, as went on to land two additional significant TV roles in the following years. In 2006, he earned a recurring part on the series so noTORIous , a show loosely based on the life of Tori Spelling. Quinto played Spelling's best friend, Sasan, on the series, which was canceled after only one season. However, Quinto would go on to garner his biggest TV role yet in 2006.

TV Shows and Movies: 'Heroes' and 'Star Trek'

Following so noTORIous , Quinto appeared on the immensely popular sci-fi TV drama Heroes alongside other up-and-coming actors such as Hayden Panettiere and Ali Larter. Quinto played the mysterious villain Sylar, who could take the abilities of anyone else as a superhuman serial killer, on the well-received series, which stayed on the air for four seasons and shot Quinto to superstardom.

Around this same time, Quinto was vying for a part in the J.J. Abrams-directed Star Trek (2009), a reboot of the acclaimed sci-fi series. Quinto's Heroes co-star, Greg Grunberg—who had previously worked with Abrams on his series Alias —put in a good word for the actor, and the rest was history: After Abrams and Quinto met to discuss the film, a new Spock was chosen. Quinto was the first person to be cast in the film.

Quinto has since found more consistent work in film and TV. In 2011, he joined the cast of the series American Horror Story , playing Dr. Oliver Thredson. Soon after, he reprised the role of Spock for Abrams's Star Trek Into Darkness (2013).

Personal Life

Following the suicide of 14-year-old Jamey Rodemeyer, a victim of gay bullying, Quinto publicly came out as a gay man in October 2011. Although he had long been a staunch advocate for LGBT equality, he had kept his private life out of the public eye until Rodemeyer's death.

Around this same time, Quinto became romantically linked to actor Jonathan Groff, known for his role on the popular TV series Glee . Their relationship reportedly ended in July 2013.

QUICK FACTS

  • Name: Zachary Quinto
  • Birth Year: 1977
  • Birth date: June 2, 1977
  • Birth State: Pennsylvania
  • Birth City: Pittsburgh
  • Birth Country: United States
  • Gender: Male
  • Best Known For: Zachary Quinto starred as the main villain on the popular supernatural television show 'Heroes,' and has played Spock in J.J. Abrams's rebooted 'Star Trek' film series.
  • Theater and Dance
  • Astrological Sign: Gemini
  • Carnegie Mellon University
  • Central Catholic High School

CITATION INFORMATION

  • Article Title: Zachary Quinto Biography
  • Author: Biography.com Editors
  • Website Name: The Biography.com website
  • Url: https://www.biography.com/actors/zachary-quinto
  • Access Date:
  • Publisher: A&E; Television Networks
  • Last Updated: September 2, 2020
  • Original Published Date: April 2, 2014
  • I believe in the power of intention to change the landscape of our society—and it is my intention to live an authentic life of compassion and integrity and action

Famous Actors

topshot us entertainment film award oscars pressroom

Constance Wu

awkwafina

Anna May Wong

jerry seinfeld stands in front of a blue curtain and extends one arm out, he wears a dark suit with a white collared shirt and tie

Jerry Seinfeld

actor dakota fanning

Dakota Fanning

camila mendes

Camila Mendes

elisabeth moss photo

Elisabeth Moss

zendaya smiles at the camera, she wears a white sweater and stud earrings, blurry crowds of people fill stands behind her

Ryan Reynolds

kirsten dunst wearing a black dress and looking straight ahead for a portrait photo

Kirsten Dunst

After Mysterious New Star Trek Movie Is Announced, Zachary Quinto Reveals Original Cast's Feelings On A Sequel

star trek movies with zachary quinto

Star Trek Beyond was the last time Trekkies were able to see the franchise in theaters. While the property's presence has grown on television, fans have been craving a big-screen return with the original cast. But Zachary Quinto and the cast have been waiting on the news just like the fans. With the recent announcement of a mystery Star Trek film, Quinto revealed the original cast’s feelings on a sequel.

Since the release of Star Trek Beyond , Zachary Quinto and the cast have dealt with many setbacks. The case for Star Trek 4 has become less of a possibility as the cast has been busy with other projects. But that still hasn’t stop Trekkies and movie audiences from asking about a new installment. Quinto expressed his thoughts on a possible Star Trek Beyond sequel:

Honestly, I have no real idea what’s going on with Star Trek. [But] we all love each other and we all love that experience and I’m sure if it comes back around and we’re all available, I’m sure we’d be happy to jump back on board. No pun intended. But I don’t know — that’s in other people’s hands and I know I, for one, have had sort of moved on in terms of any kind of expectations, but you never know things come back in surprising ways and it’s surprising times, and it could be fun if it happens.

Since the first film in the rebooted franchise, Star Trek fans have loved seeing Zachary Quinto play everybody’s favorite Vulcan. Given Spock’s storyline in Star Trek Beyond , fans have been wanting more of his story along with the other Star Trek characters. Zachary Quinto’s performance along with the storylines helped to revive a seemingly dormant franchise under the rise of the MCU and DCEU.

During his interview with Pop Culture , Zachary Quinto was asked about the possibility of a Spock-led film in the vein of the MCU. He admitted to being open to the idea if the time and circumstances permitted it. Quinto said he would love returning to the character if the storytelling was right and necessary.

Zachary Quinto’s words came on the heels of news of a mysterious Star Trek film that popped up on Paramount’s film schedule. The listing sent Trekkies into a frenzy as it has been five years since the release of Star Trek Beyond . Quinto and the cast’s openness to returning to the franchise bode well for a possible Star Trek 4 . Years of developmental hell have finally paid off, but only time will tell if Quinto and the cast will return for the new film.

Despite fanfare and acclaim for Star Trek Beyond , the film’s release was marked by tragedy. Before the sequel was released, co-star Anton Yelchin lost his life in an unfortunate accident. His lack of presence during the promotion of the film could be felt as Zachary Quinto and the Star Trek cast had to speak on their late co-star . During promotions, Quinto and the cast seemed indifferent over doing a fourth Star Trek film . But over time, the cast has been more open to returning to the franchise.

But another hiccup in Stark Trek 4 ‘s development was Star Trek Beyond ’s underperformance at the box office . The film’s underperformance threw the possibility of a fourth Star Trek into question, especially after both Chrises – Pine and Hemsworth – reportedly walked away from the film due to pay cuts. But the recent announcement meant Pine, Zachary Quinto, Zoe Saldana and other cast members may return or another possible reboot might be on the horizon. The mystery Star Trek film is set to arrive on June 9, 2023.

CINEMABLEND NEWSLETTER

Your Daily Blend of Entertainment News

star trek movies with zachary quinto

A boy from Greenwood, South Carolina. CinemaBlend Contributor. An animation enthusiast (anime, US and international films, television). Freelance writer, designer and artist. Lover of music (US and international).

Zendaya Admits She’s Gotten ‘Actual Scars’ From Filming Euphoria And Challengers

After Crushing At The Met Gala, Jeremy Strong Might Be Joining A Musical Biopic

Sydney Sweeney Just Signed On To Get Ripped For A Boxing Biopic After Anyone But You And Immaculate Successes, And I'm Totally Here For It

Most Popular

  • 2 'You Didn't Look Human:' SNL's Mikey Day Tells The Story Behind Why His Look In Viral Beavis And Butt-Head Sketch Broke Heidi Gardner
  • 3 After Crushing At The Met Gala, Jeremy Strong Might Be Joining A Musical Biopic
  • 4 Disney+, Hulu And Max Will Be Offered As A Bundle, And I Have Two Major Questions
  • 5 ‘That’s Why It Worked.’ Emily Blunt Reveals BTS Details Behind Her Barbenheimer Oscars Sketch With Ryan Gosling And Why It Paid Off

star trek movies with zachary quinto

Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto And The Crew To Return For A New Star Trek Film

Star Trek Into Darkness Tops US Box Office Chart

Through the last few years, the only place to go and get some Star Trek entertainment has been on small screens, with the televisual side of the franchise expanding like a ruptured warp core. The film arm, meanwhile, has been stuck drifting lifelessly as Paramount explored different options. Now, though it appears to be back on track, with Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Simon Pegg and the rest of the reboot timeline crew in talks to return.

JJ Abrams was part of Paramount's big investor day announcement, and confirmed that a fourth movie featuring Pine's Kirk, Quinto's Spock and the rest of their colleagues (Zoe Saldana, Simon Pegg, Karl Urban and John Cho) is fully in the works. What's not yet known is how the story will deal with the absence of Chekov, as played by the late Anton Yelchin, who died shortly before 2016's Star Trek Beyond premiered.

"We are thrilled to say that we are hard at work on a new Star Trek film that will be shooting by the end of the year that will be featuring our original cast and some new characters that I think are going to be really fun and exciting and help take Star Trek into areas that you’ve just never seen before," Abrams said. "We’re thrilled about this film, we have a bunch of other stories that we’re talking about that we think will be really exciting, so can’t wait for you to see what we’re cooking up. But until then, live long and prosper."

We'd already known that WandaVision director Matt Shakman was attached, though there has been some re-shuffling of the writing line-up, with Avatar 2 's Josh Friedman and WandaVision 's Cameron Squires taking over from Lindsey Beer and Geneva Robertson-Dworet. Reportedly, Paramount executives commissioned focus group reports on fan interest in the Pine crew returning, and discovered that, yes, people still wanted to watch them.

We've been here before, of course, with rumours of a time-travel scenario that would have seen Pine's Kirk meet his dad, George, played so memorably (and briefly) by Chris Hemsworth in Abrams' 2009 movie. Actor pay deals scuppered that on like a gravitic mine, but there's always the chance they could have figured it out.

And this also likely means that other potential films in development, including those from Quentin Tarantino and Fargo 's Noah Hawley are likely headed to dry dock permanently, though Abrams' mention of "a bunch of other stories" might mean their ideas could eventually go ahead in some expanded universe.

No release date was given for the new movie, but that late 2022 shooting start points to a potential late 2023 arrival. We might see this film series boldly going forward once more.

Zachary Quinto

Zachary Quinto

  • Born June 2 , 1977 · Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
  • Birth name Zachary John Quinto
  • Height 6′ 0¾″ (1.85 m)
  • Zachary Quinto was born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, to Margaret J. (McArdle), an Irish-American office worker, and Joseph John Quinto, an Italian-American barber. Zachary graduated from Central Catholic High School in Pittsburgh, with the class of 1995, where he won Pittsburgh's Gene Kelly Award for Best Supporting Actor for his performance as the Major General in Gilbert and Sullivan's "The Pirates of Penzance". He then went on to attend Carnegie Mellon University, where he continued to hone his talents by performing in plays and musicals. He first appeared on numerous television series since 2000 and, in 2003, landed the role of computer expert "Adam Kaufman" on the Fox series, 24 (2001) , during its third season. In 2006, Quinto portrayed serial killer "Sylar" on the science fiction series, Heroes (2006) , until its cancellation in 2010, after four seasons. He was cast in his first main film role as "Spock", in the hugely successful franchise reboot, Star Trek (2009) . - IMDb Mini Biography By: Tony
  • Children No Children
  • Parents Joseph John Quinto Margaret J. Quinto (McArdle)
  • Relatives Joe Quinto (Sibling)
  • Soft mellow voice
  • Unique clipped manner of speaking
  • Often plays cold-hearted or unfeeling characters
  • Often plays villains or troubled anti-heroes
  • Distinctive eyebrows
  • Became good friends with Leonard Nimoy while playing Nimoy's iconic role as Spock in the Star Trek (2009) remake.
  • As of 2013, Zachary is the only person in history to appear on the cover of Entertainment Weekly two weeks in a row (issues 1017 and 1018). In issue 1020, the magazine published the fact that he is the only one to have that honor.
  • When he was age 16, he survived a serious car accident.
  • Close friends with Star Trek (2009) co-stars Chris Pine and Karl Urban .
  • Best friends with his Heroes (2006) co-star Milo Ventimiglia .
  • The interesting thing about my character Sylar is that my strengths as an actor seemed to go completely against the shape of a character in the shadows. I stepped into this character and then realized how much there was to play with.
  • I love when you aren't accountable to anybody or anything, and you can just be wherever you are.
  • What scares me? Oh, now that's a big question. I don't know what scares me - cockroaches, nuclear apocalypse. Fear is an interesting thing. It has a place in all of our lives. I try to be as fearless as possible. I don't always succeed, but I like to think I try.
  • [Zachary Quinto, on October 16, 2011, on his own blog, commenting on his decision to "come out" as gay on a New York Magazine article] When I found out that Jamey Rodemeyer killed himself - I felt deeply troubled. But when I found out that Jamey Rodemeyer had made an "It Gets Better" video only months before taking his own life - I felt indescribable despair. I also made an it gets better video last year - in the wake of the senseless and tragic gay teen suicides that were sweeping the nation at the time. but in light of Jamey's death - it became clear to me in an instant that living a gay life without publicly acknowledging it - is simply not enough to make any significant contribution to the immense work that lies ahead on the road to complete equality. Our society needs to recognize the unstoppable momentum toward unequivocal civil equality for every gay lesbian bisexual and transgendered citizen of this country. Gay kids need to stop killing themselves because they are made to feel worthless by cruel and relentless bullying. Parents need to teach their children principles of respect and acceptance. We are witnessing an enormous shift of collective consciousness throughout the world. We are at the precipice of great transformation within our culture and government. I believe in the power of intention to change the landscape of our society - and it is my intention to live an authentic life of compassion and integrity and action. Jamey Rodemeyer's life changed mine. and while his death only makes me wish that I had done this sooner - I am eternally grateful to him for being the catalyst for change within me. Now I can only hope to serve as the same catalyst for even one other person in this world. that - I believe - is all that we can ask of ourselves and of each other.
  • [on losing his father to cancer at seven years old] I found myself in a pattern of being attracted to people who were somehow unavailable, and what I realized was that I was protecting myself because I equated the idea of connection and love with trauma and death. I had to do a lot of work on the couch to really get to a place where I was able to show up to a relationship with someone who was actually capable of being in one - and that took a lot of trial and error. And I'm still working on all that stuff - that will never stop. But I definitely want kids... I want to share.

Contribute to this page

  • Learn more about contributing

More from this person

  • View agent, publicist, legal and company contact details on IMDbPro

More to explore

Production art

Recently viewed

Screen Rant

Spock actors from j.j. abrams movies & strange new worlds unite at star trek convention.

4

Your changes have been saved

Email Is sent

Please verify your email address.

You’ve reached your account maximum for followed topics.

The Simpsons Season 35 Brought Back A Tired Show Trend & I'm Over It

Grey’s anatomy season 20 has dropped a crucial plotline that needs to return in season 21, why blue bloods officially being canceled after season 14 is so upsetting.

  • Zachary Quinto and Ethan Peck, who both portray Mr. Spock in Star Trek, met for the first time on stage at a convention in Las Vegas.
  • Scott Mantz, the moderator of the event, shared a photo of himself with the two Spocks on Twitter, expressing his gratitude for the conversation.
  • Ethan Peck also shared a backstage photo with Zachary Quinto on Instagram, accompanied by the song "Two of Hearts" by Stacey Q.

Zachary Quinto and Ethan Peck, the actors who play Mr. Spock in J.J. Abrams' Star Trek movies and Star Trek: Strange New Worlds , united on stage for the first time. Quinto appeared at STLV: 57-Year Mission in Las Vegas for a solo panel and to sign autographs from fans. Peck was one of several cast members from Strange New Worlds also at the convention, and STLV's organizers wisely seized the opportunity Peck to join Quinto on stage so that the two Spock actors could meet for the first time in front of the fans.

Star Trek expert, host, and film critic Scott Mantz, who moderated Zachary Quinto's panel at STLV: 57-Year Mission, shared his photo on Twitter with the two Spocks, Quinto and Ethan Peck . Check out his Tweet below.

Ethan Peck shared his own backstage photo with Zachary Quinto, which he amusingly set to the song "Two of Hearts" by Stacey Q. Check out his Instagram post below:

Star Trek's 2 Spock Actors In J.J. Abrams' Movies & Strange New Worlds Explained

Leonard Nimoy originated the iconic Mr. Spock in Star Trek: The Original Series , and he portrayed the Vulcan in Star Trek: The Animated Series , the six Star Trek: TOS movies, and in Star Trek: The Next Generation . Nimoy reprised the older Spock opposite Zachary Quinto's Spock in J.J. Abrams' 2009 Star Trek reboot and in Star Trek Into Darkness. Nimoy passed the torch and his iconic ears to Quinto, who proved that audiences would accept a new actor playing the legendary Vulcan Starfleet Officer, although Quinto's younger Spock existed in the alternate Kelvin Timeline. Unfortunately, 2016's Star Trek Beyond was Zachary Quinto 's last outing as Spock.

In Star Trek: Strange New Worlds , however, Ethan Peck plays the younger version of the same Spock Leonard Nimoy portrayed in Star Trek's Prime Timeline. Peck's Lt. Spock is the Science Officer of the USS Enterprise commanded by Captain Christopher Pike (Anson Mount) about 6-7 years before Captain James T. Kirk (William Shatner) takes over the starship. With Star Trek 4 still in development hell, it's unclear if Zachary Quinto will don the ears again, but he is happy handing off the torch to Ethan Peck, as reported by TrekMovie . Sadly, Leonard Nimoy passed away in 2015 and couldn't join his fellow Spocks at STLV: 57-Year Mission, but Nimoy's spirit was felt by audiences when Star Trek 's two current Spock actors united on stage for the first time.

Sources: Scott Mantz Twitter, Ethan Peck Instagram, TrekMovie.com

  • Star Trek (2009)
  • Star Trek Beyond (2016)

TrekMovie.com

  • May 8, 2024 | Star Trek’s Michelle Yeoh To Star In ‘Blade Runner 2099’ Series
  • May 7, 2024 | Crowdfunded ‘Space Command: Redemption’ Released, Features Star Trek’s Doug Jones, Robert Picardo & More
  • May 6, 2024 | William Shatner Calls Return To Star Trek “Intriguing Idea,” Suggests Digital De-Aging To Play Kirk Again
  • May 6, 2024 | Preview ‘Star Trek: Discovery’ Episode 507 With New Images, Trailer And Clip From “Erigah”
  • May 5, 2024 | Alex Kurtzman Says There’s An Infinite Number Of Star Trek Stories To Tell, But New Shows Must Be “Authentic”

Zachary Quinto Says Creative Differences Delaying ‘Star Trek 4’; He’s Happy Handing Off Spock To Ethan Peck

star trek movies with zachary quinto

| August 7, 2023 | By: Anthony Pascale 140 comments so far

Zachary Quinto was one of the headliners at the 57-Year Mission convention in Las Vegas and the most prominent member of the Kelvin cast to appear on stage. As with all of the other SAG actors at the event, Quinto stuck to the rules of not talking in detail about his work on Star Trek (or other projects), but he did make some comments about the impact the franchise had on him and the potential of returning to the role of Spock for a fourth time. He was also joined on stage by Strange New World s star Ethan Peck for a meeting of the Spocks.   

What’s holding back Star Trek 4 ?

It’s been over seven years since the release of Star Trek Beyond , the third film in the Kelvin timeline movies produced by J.J. Abrams. There have been a number of starts and stops for new Trek projects at Paramount Pictures since then, like a planned 2023 movie getting removed from Paramount’s release calendar last year after delays led to director Matt Shakman exiting the project.

During the Q&A, a fan asked Quinto if he believed the proliferation of streaming Star Trek shows on Paramount+ was the reason Paramount hasn’t moved forward on another Star Trek film since Beyond . Quinto didn’t see it that way, saying:

I don’t think that has anything to do with it. Actually, I think the more there is, the more it gets people excited about what could be.

Zachary Quinto with moderator Scott Mantz at STLV 2023 (Photo: Jon Spencer/TrekMovie.com)

Zachary Quinto with moderator Scott Mantz at STLV 2023 (Photo: Jon Spencer/TrekMovie.com)

Quinto then gave his assessment over the delay and likelihood of another Kelvin movie:

I think there’s a lot of other stuff, creative things. It’s complicated. The fact that anything good gets made is kind of miracle. I think it’s about different people having different agendas and ideas about what it will be. And I don’t know if and when it will happen… And if coalesces again and we come back and we’re able to do it, wonderful. If not, we had a great run.

Since early 2022 when producer J.J. Abrams and Paramount announced the Star Trek 4 project that was to be released this year, members of the cast (including Quinto) have expressed their interest in returning; however, some have also noted the difficulty of aligning the schedules for all the stars. Late last year, Zoe Saldaña also said she felt the delay was more than just scheduling . Last year, Chris Pine expressed concerns that Paramount was shooting for a billion-dollar box office movie, arguing, “I’ve always thought that Star Trek should operate in the zone that is smaller. You know, it’s not a Marvel appeal.”

The last official word from Abrams was back in March when he talked up the project, telling Esquire Magazine he felt the planned fourth movie had “a story that feels as compelling as the first one.” However, Paramount and Abrams have yet to hire a new director or put a Star Trek project back on the release calendar.

Zachary Quinto as Spock in Star Trek Beyond (Paramount Pictures)

Zachary Quinto as Spock in Star Trek Beyond (Paramount Pictures)

The gift of Nimoy’s friendship

During his panel, Zachary Quinto spoke about his relationship with Leonard Nimoy; the pair formed a bond during the filming of the 2009 Star Trek movie and remained close until Nimoy’s passing in 2015. When asked about taking on the iconic role, Quinto pointed to how important Nimoy was for him:

I was so fortunate because of Leonard [Nimoy]’s involvement in the process, and the one thing I never could have anticipated was how instrumental he would become in my life personally. But from a creative standpoint, and from a professional standpoint, having that relationship and that introduction to this world helped me understand the character. I think it also helped audiences accept me as this new version of the character.  And for that I was so eternally grateful. But it was really that friendship that became one of the greatest gifts. I would say THE greatest of playing this role of Spock in the Star Trek universe has been the friendships that have come out of it, my brotherhood with Chris [Pine], and my relationship with Leonard and his family and with the whole cast.

Zachary Quinto and Leonard Nimoy in 2009 Star Trek movie (Paramount Pictures)

Zachary Quinto and Leonard Nimoy in 2009 Star Trek movie (Paramount Pictures)

Handing the mantle of Spock to Peck

During Quinto’s panel, the organizers brought Star Trek: Strange New Worlds star Ethan Peck onto the stage for an unplanned meeting of the Spocks. Although they have spoken before, this was their first time meeting in person. They greeted each other with this exchange:

Quinto: This is great, right? This is the nature of the [Star Trek] universe. It evolves and changes and we all bring our own perspectives and experience to it. Nothing is more exciting than that. Peck: This is momentous. It is awesome to be with you

After speaking together on stage for a little while, as the panel was coming to a close, Quinto described how he felt about the event and about Ethan Peck, seeing a bit of a parallel in how (like with Nimoy) he is happy to see the role played by a new actor:

I just want to say before we finish up, how grateful I feel to be here and how I feel like my experience in this world, it’s evolved into other iterations and other forums. And to be able to share the stage with the person to whom I am now passing the mantle to in a lot of ways, who is engaging you all in these stories from the perspective of this character now into the future. It’s really exciting. It’s really gratifying. You all are really a truly wonderful fan base. And I feel heartened and just optimistic. There’s a lot of reasons and a lot of ways in which we can feel really discouraged about humanity, but this collection of people in this franchise and what it’s based on is not one of them. And so I feel really happy to be here with you all.

Zachary Quinto and Ethan Peck with moderator Scott Mantz at STLV 2023 (Photo: Jon Spencer/TrekMovie.com)

Zachary Quinto and Ethan Peck with moderator Scott Mantz at STLV 2023 (Photo: Jon Spencer/TrekMovie.com)

Check back for more of our coverage from STLV 2023 .

Find more news and analysis on  upcoming Star Trek feature films .

Related Articles

star trek movies with zachary quinto

Strange New Worlds

Prep Begins For ‘Star Trek: Strange New Worlds’ Season 3 Finale; Cast And Directors Share BTS Images

All Access Star Trek episode 181 - TrekMovie - Star Trek: Discovery "Face the Strange"

All Access Star Trek Podcast , Discovery , Lower Decks , Star Trek Origin Movie , Strange New Worlds

Podcast: All Access Faces The Strange On ‘Star Trek: Discovery’

star trek movies with zachary quinto

Actor Talks “Authentic” Scotty On ‘Star Trek: Strange New Worlds’; Season 3 Production Passes Milestone

star trek movies with zachary quinto

Lower Decks , Strange New Worlds

‘Star Trek: Strange New Worlds’ Renewed For Season 4; ‘Lower Decks’ To End With Season 5

Zachary Quinto has been and continues to be a great ambassador for STAR TREK. I think we can all forgive him for being on that mercifully short-lived series THE SLAP.

Yeah, what an outstanding human being!

Hey Matalas, take notes please.

I actually liked that mini-series and I watched the original Australian version as well. He was good at playing a dick lol.

The ‘creative differences’ are Paramount can’t seem to decide on a script and no one is gonna attach themselves to a project without a script. The fact that there seems to be little enthusiasm for getting the film done isn’t helping.

Paramount would also do well to disabuse itself of the desire to get MCU-type numbers from a Trek film.

“Paramount would also do well to disabuse itself of the desire to get MCU-type numbers from a Trek film”

Sure, but even the MCU itself does no longer get any MCU-type numbers.Apart from Spidey and GotG, the Marvel movies have been rather down-to-earth box office-wise lately. I believe the traditional action franchise blockbuster is finished. I still hope for an exception for space opera flicks (Avatar 2 and GotG 3 numbers support that hope) but I’m not very optimistic.

Trek needs to cut down on budget and aim for something closer to the first original movies. .

I really hope the studios don’t take this summer’s boxoffice as a nonrecurring phenomena — OP and BARB prove that audiences will flock to something that doesn’t have a number in the title, even if it does break precedent and have a brain in its head (the filmmakers in the case of Barbie, if not the character herself — I dunno for sure as I haven’t seen either of these yet.)

It’d be awesome if the studios took a really good look at scripts mired on the Black List for years and started developing really good unmade pieces of writing without focusing on landing some 8-figure star. I’ve been saying that since there were 8-figure stars (was it Jim Carrey who started all that 30 years back, or was it Travolta?), but now is as desperate a time as any.

Pare back VFX enormously and maybe the vendors will be able to deliver at a higher quality level, too.

As someone who enjoyed the Kelvin era movies, a legitimate criticism of Bad Robot was their overuse of VFX. If they made the last three movies in the 120MM range, we’d not be having this conversation today about then the next movie would be made.

They haven’t proved they can budget a movie either. Rise of Skywalker was nearly as expensive as the last Indiana Jones.

That’s not really a fair comparison given post Covid movie production is 35% more expensive in general.

JJ never minced words about not doing Trek on the cheap. He rolled into Paramount selling a VFX extravaganza, and that’s what Paramount bought, with visions of Marvel box office revenue dancing in their corporate heads. In BR’s defense, their three Star Wars movies made bank, it’s not really a fair comparison.

True but it was always a pipe dream that a Star Trek movie could get anywhere near the kind of money Marvel and Star Wars makes no matter how much money you throw at it and I think they finally realized that.

But you can’t blame them for trying.

For a hot second after Star Trek 2009 it looked like it could actually happen. I mean for a second there it looked like Trek was making about the same money as the first Iron man flick and maybe Trek could grow from there. But then STID! and NOPE!

In terms of domestically, yeah I think they had a real shot of earning at least what a lot of the early MCU films did. But in foreign B.O., that’s where it was never a reality. Of course the entire irony is that these films really only exist because they wanted Star Trek to be a bigger global player but with all the ‘hype’ over the first movie, it still only made $130 million abroad. It basically bombed. MCU movies makes more than that abroad on their opening weekends. That was always the bigger issue.

ID and BEY got a little lucky when they got those movies into IMAX in China and made a little more money and became the second biggest market outside of America. But even that was pretty small when compared to bigger American movies that played in that country. Beyond made around $65 million and was the top Kelvin film. Now take Fast and Furious which made $370 million in China with the 7th movie. I think that is still the biggest movie in China today. But Fast X made less than half with only $140 million and every movie had made less than the last one. That’s another reason these movies are doing more poorly this summer, China is not picking up the slack like it was just 4 or 5 years ago. They are turning away from Hollywood movies, at leas legally. ;)

Same for the Marvel movies, China is what help to make them so massive as well. I have to check the numbers but I don’t think ANY of the Marvel films made more than $200 million in China this year or last. But I’m sure someone will correct me.

So with China being so flaky these days, there is no guarantee a Trek movie would even get approved there and I doubt a movie would make more than half of what ID and BEY did. And without China, ID would’ve just made what the 09 movie made. Beyound wouldn’t even have broken $300 million. Now imagine if they make another $150+ million movie and it doesn’t even get shown there?

That’s why fans have to take the rose colored glasses off and look at the reality. There is a reason why we’ve gone 7 years without a movie and every new project has stalled. The numbers just doesn’t line up where they want these movies to be and there are way more factors working against them today versus 2016 when Beyond failed.

Yeah sadly Trek has never been a big movie seller overseas

They made bank while Abrams kept ditching his Paramount contract to go make them!

ROS was a lot but of course it was easy to justify it at the time when you’re making billion dollar plus movies. But I highly doubt next Star Wars movie will make as much since sadly fans have cooled on that franchise as Trek fans have cooled on its movies.

Those movies were always too high for what they made. If they found a way to lower the budget by, let’s say, a lot, maybe one could get made before Chris Pine reaches 50 years old.

I don’t care either way, just fun to talk about it. Even if they made it, it would probably be on Paramount+ in 6 weeks and most would just wait to watch it there. Transformers came there in the same time. I watched that movie there the day after it landed. It was actually decent. 😃

You’re drawing the wrong lesson from that. Regardless of whether it’s a sequel or not, good movies usually do well and bad movies don’t.

There are exceptions — The latest MI movie has extremely high ratings by fans who saw it, but it was completely swamped by the Barbenheimer effect — picking bad release dates and piss-poor pre-marketing can also doom good movies — Beyond, J Carter and Solo, for example.

I have never seen any consistent trend of good movies doing better than bad ones — almost entirely the opposite, to be honest, if we count ‘mediocre’ in with bad.

Quite a few Black List scripts still turn out badly. Passengers was one, I believe. And Seven Pounds, Lions for Lambs, and London Boulevard. It still comes down to getting the right cooks and secret ingredients together and hoping the recipe is a winner after every cook has had their turn with it.

But I do agree the success of Oppenheimer and Barbie (as even worthy entries in nonetheless long in the tooth franchises run into trouble) hopefully portends to some chances being taken on new stories and bolder takes on IP in future.

Wow, yeah, PASSENGERS was seriously grotesque, that proves your point even w/o the other examples! (tho I enjoyed LONDON BLVD, which I saw as a step toward rehabilitating Colin Ferrell into a good actor again. With LIONS FOR LAMBS, that was supposed to be my first new article for ICG in about 6 or 7 years, but we couldn’t find anybody on the crew who wanted to talk about it. Geez, even for BATTLEFIELD EARTH, I found people wanting to talk about it — not all of them, but most.)

Lions for Lambs to me is just notable for how lost Tom Cruise was when Paramount cut him loose. He thought he could show up his detractors by reviving United Artists and making hits out of anything just by green lighting and starring in them himself. Bless him and his eventual comeback, but he was really out of his depth back then and that was sort of epitomized by every scene in that movie where Meryl Streep acts circles around him.

Is that when he and Paula Wagner parted company or was that later on?

It would seem to be what precipitated their split. After Valkyrie they parted ways as an official duo and the UA venture went away quietly. UA isn’t even mentioned on her Wikipedia entry.

But she still produced Jack Reacher with him afterwards, so maybe not an acrimonious split.

Passengers was just 50 Girls 50. From EC comics. A book i think even Al Williamson apologized for as misogynistic nonsense.

thats true about MCU – now its really just Spiderman, Guardians and (obviously) Avengers (and Deadpool) that are safe bets..

even Indiana Jones has bombed! (making less than the Ford less Solo!) as has Keatons return as Batman! (The Flash was basically sold as like a legacy sequel to Batman89). both unthinkable just a few years ago. hell even the new Mission Impossible has notably underperformed currently nearing its end with 500m (when estimates were saying it would pull in a billion due to last one doing 800m and Top Gun Mavericks crazy 1.5b)

so in this current climate a Kelvin Trek 4 would probably be lucky to pull in 200m ww! (that being said..id still love to see them back in a 150m budget cinema movie! and i still think Paramount will be planning something big/multiversey involving various casts for 2026)

Ford took a massive pay cut over Skull and it still flopped. The budget was untenable at 295 million. It doesn’t look like a 300 million dollar movie it looks like it cost half that. The cgi was bad. It was shot digitally. Not up to the par of the first 4. It has two scenes i loved, but it doesn’t make it a good movie. Sallah and Marion’s scenes are good fanservice. More respectful than Disney Star Wars yes, but it also feels like a non canon entry like those. Like a expensive fan fiction.

Only Trekkies care about another movie and with less fans interested in JJ verse, a $200 million box office take, especially these days, is probably on point.

And Star Trek is nowhere close to those other franchises. And with the exception of Mission Impossible I didn’t watch any of those either. Only saw three movies this summer.

I would go see another Star Trek movie though but I doubt the $12 I spend will make make much of a difference. Or maybe it will be twice that much by the time another one comes out. 😂😥

I think a $200 million gross is a little too low IMO. I’m thinking minimum would be $250-300 million. Yeah still nothing to write home about but those would be acceptable if they kept the budget around $100 million.

But yeah I doubt Paramount is interested in making a movie with those kinds of projections. And yes of course it could go higher but I feel $300 million would be the ceiling right now and not the floor. That’s just not great.

The MCU is a dumpster fire right now.

The MCU right now is basically Star Trek right after enterprise and nemesis. They really be smart to take a five-year break and then gradually reboot the entire freaking thing. Nobody wants to Phase 17…lol

I’m interested in a good X-men movie but the rest not so much, it is a bit overdone. Its like DC i just want a good Superman movie sequel, i liked Man of Steel. I don’t really like the idea of a combined universe to be honest. It makes so much watered down, and like a homework assignment. Too man shows and movies.

I think all the multi-verse stuff lowers the stakes in a way that audiences can’t connect with. Kill a main character, fine … just go grab him from another reality if need be. It cheapens drama, like if every other TREK film had them killing Spock off.

I agree, MCU is now struggling more and more (but I think most studios would still love to be where MCU is now lol). So when that franchise is faltering along with the others, that bold even less for Trek unfortunately.

I do think we will get another Trek movie of course, MAYBE within 3-5 years (I’m thinking 3 now since that would coincide with the 60th anniversary). But it will probably be another reboot of some kind with a stripped down budget…but I been wrong before lol.

That’s so true. But the problem has alway been the sheer amount of money they pour into making these films in the first place. They practically have to make a billion to turn in a decent profit. Trek movies historically made money because they were cheap to make Trek’s II – IV famoulyt cost about the same as the Motion Picture alone and made way more profit.

Exactly, they poured so much ridiculous money into these things they expected real money like GOTG or even Star Wars money. But they got Sonic the Hedgehog money instead. 😂

That’s why they need to scrap these movies for good and make a movie around $80-100 million tops. Anything over that you’re just asking for trouble.

BYW I haven’t seen you here or the other place that much my best friend. I don’t think I ever saw your thoughts about the Crossover. What did you think? I thought it was amazing.

I told you to have faith in the crossover and it will provide! I hope it did for you too! 🙂

Sorry, I was on Vacation last week!

Yes, that’s literally the definition of “creative differences.”

Considering the new MI is the first in the series since 3 to underperform and that is Tom Cruise, how much chance is there for Star Trek in the movies? There is no place for a 300 million dollar Star Trek film when that is probably all it will make.

So you work at the studio?

I don’t think deciding on a script is a big deal and more about how much money it will cost them. And there is clearly zero enthusiasm to make another movie since this is the longest they’ve gone without making a movie all the way back to TMP. The second longest drought between Star Trek movies was between Nemesis and the first Kelvin movie and that was a 6 and a half year gap. Now we’re already passed 7 years with five cancelled projects and not a peep about the next one because there probably isn’t a next one yet.

And I don’t blame Paramount at all. These are expensive movies, they have to perform, period. I know one will happen at some point but if the money and confidence is not there right now and in a climate where these once sure fire franchises are struggling these days, then it’s not there.

Even MI Dead Reckoning Part 1 coming off the high of Top Gun 2 is a massive disappointment, It has to make what something between 700 and 900 million to be a hit. The series hasn’t had a near flop since 3.

I actually brought up Dead Reckoning disappointing performance on the Prodigy thread a few days ago. Yeah, this is the problem, if movies you were sure were going to make money (and a lot of it) is now failing, that makes it that much harder for a riskier proposition like Star Trek to ever get made.

But to be fair to MI 7, the biggest issue seems to be it lost it’s IMAX and Dolby screenings after just a week and all the attention has been on Oppenheimer and Barbie since. They sort of shot themselves in the foot saying DR was meant to be seen on the biggest screens and once that went away people lost interest.

And I read an article a week ago that said IMAX executives was suggesting to Paramount they move the date of the movie to give it more time on IMAX but the studio refused.

But if it kept itts original $190 million budget, it would at least be making a profit right now.

One segment of exhibition that is still doing well are Premium Large Format theaters. Hopefully Barbenheimer and the M:I fumble encourage more of them to be built. The dance card for IMAX screenings is pretty packed for the next year.

Quinto is a class act. He was handed the torch by Nimoy and is graciously handing it off to Peck. He still might be called on to play Spock again, but he also knows that’s highly unlikely as time is slipping away.

Kudos to both of these gentlemen for representing the best of Trek.

Add into the mix now that Paramount Global’s streaming service is an open artery on its revenue, with everything else that’s gone wrong we’re not going to see a movie (on the big screen) for years. Q2 results are after the bell today. It’s expected to be brutal.

Phil, I get so happy for you when these articles come up. I’m picturing you as one of the old dudes in Cocoon, but instead of alien pods charging you up with youth, it’s Trekmovie articles that are suggesting the next Star Trek movie won’t happen — no doubt right now you are glowing green as your body becomes 20 years younger from this infusion of ‘the next Trek movie is dead” news.

Either that, or the raging alcoholic in me is playing the “I haven’t heard anything” drinking game….

It’s really too bad because I really like Paramoun+. I’m still upset over Prodigy but overall it’s a decent service. But man it’s tough to be a fan of this franchise right now. The future feels a lot less stable with everything going on. I predict P+ predicament is going to be much worse next year with far less content, but I guess you can say that about everything right now.

I go further to say that despite all their management drama and questionable decisions, I still like Paramount and root for them now that they are an underdog. The history of the studio is incredible, they have made some amazing movies for well over a century. And Star Trek is one of their Crown Jewels which they do prioritize. I think what would happen if a rival media conglomerate with bigger franchises were to take it over and it’s not pleasant.

Oh yeah very much agree. Especially back in the 80s and 90s, Paramount was really the king back then. They have a ton of iconic and classic films obviously and it was the studio that made the biggest output of movies every year. And yes, the home of Star Trek!

It’s not at the peak it used to be for sure but still makes great movies and shows. Unfortunately it has turned its attention too much to IPs and ‘tentpole’ movies because that’s what everyone is chasing today and it’s fair to say it’s been losing that battle lately with Top Gun Maverick the lone exception in years. And while Star Trek has always been sort of in the middle in terms of BO success, their other movie IPs people don’t talk about a lot like G.I. Joe, Terminator and TMNT has all been struggling way more recently.

As big as it’s library is, Paramount doesn’t own a ton of reliable franchises, which is why they cling to Trek and M:I as they are wholly owned and high profile. Transformers, G.I. Joe and Terminator are all licenses subject to negotiations.

Viacom’s biggest blunder though was passing up the option to buy Marvel. They did a stock buyback instead.

At least they own TMNT and the new film will make money – sounds like they really cracked it and kept the budget manageable. If only it were so simple for Trek films.

Yeah all good points. Can’t really disagree with any of that although I didn’t know they had the option to buy Marvel. I know they were distributing the movies before Disney bought it. Yeah they have to be kicking themselves lol.

And I did look up to see how well the new TMNT movie did this weekend. OK, but I don’t know what the budget is but I imagine much lower. And yes, that’s what they need to do with Star Trek again. And if people think 7 years is a long time between movies, imagine when we finally get another movie and THAT bombs too? It will probably be over a decade easily. They have to get in a cheaper mindset and just make smaller movies so they can feel more confident to produce them more. The Kelvin movies are too expensive and sorry, just not worth it when it’s basically just been an ubervillain trying to destroy the Federation.

TMNT cost $75 million. And the director was doing interviews where he said they were under the gun due to realizing they had to rework the script entirely, but they put all of that on themselves so as not to create a crunch for the animators. Practically a foreign concept these days. And apparently the movie is a delight!

Paramount used to be budget-conscious to the point of being a tightwad that was not talent-friendly. They famously refused to open the purse strings when Fox ran into budget overruns on Titanic, meaning they still got domestic box office for I believe $65 million. And I for one started to notice the tricks the Trek movies had to employ to circumvent their small budgets. I definitely remember decrying Paramount at the time for not coughing up a little extra money for more exotic location filming and better VFX in Insurrection, new sets in TUC, no stock shots in Generations, and a longer space battle in First Contact. They still looked great on the big screen most of the time, but I was guilty of bigger franchise envy for sure.

But at least we were getting movies. Now of course it’s the opposite problem. JJ proved the adage of spending more money to make more money, but everyone overestimated the reach of the franchise. $100 million needs to be spent carefully these days to not look cheap, but I really agree that’s close to the price point they can afford to make money on these movies and still look good.

The alternative is no movies at all.

Funny that we used to complain the Trek films were too cheap, but at least that was largely a guarantee we’d keep getting them.

They also passed on making John Carter of Mars directed by Favreau. Maybe dodged a flop.Who knows. Could have been better than the Disney version.

Q2 results beat expectations.

They are both great but neither of them is the complete deal. Quinto has the looks, Peck has got the voice. Together they would be a perfect Spock.

Maybe there could be a transporter accident and we get Quipeck :))

Jettison the Kelvin timeline into the ash heap of history.

If they are dead set on making a 300 million dollar Trek blockbuster they might as well go for broke and make JJ an offer he can’t refuse to direct Star trek 4. The problem is still the same though they have no script. Might as well give Orci and Kurtzman a crack at it. Since those guys who wrote Rings of Power couldn’t come up with a story.

They must have a whole bundle of scripts by now, given the many false starts since Beyond came out. The problem seems to be that none of these scripts is liked by enough people in power to get made.

I guess there aren’t folks like Meyer who can take several disparate scripts, mine them for what works and then create a new synthesis of their best qualities … in twelve days.

Of course that is assuming there is stuff that works in any or all of them.

dust off Orcis ST3 script. JJ directs. Cranston as the villian, Alice Eve back. CG deage Shatner to 1994 era. :)

I don’t think this movie could afford Abrams. He’s a HUGE reason STID went as high as it did and that was the days they were hoping for a billion dollar hit. And it’s obvious Abrams is not interested in directing since they had literally a year for him to replace Shakman. That or like I said, they just can’t afford him. If so…good! ;)

And Orci’s script involved both Shatner and Nimoy. I don’t think it will work without him since it also involved Vulcan and changing the timeline. I would imagine Prime Spock would be a huge factor in that.

Abrams should do it as a favour to the cast for jumping ship to SW in 2013 :), thus enabling Paramount to jettison the (superior) Orci script and Shatner to bring in Lin and Peggs script which (let’s face it) resulted in the (temporary?) death of the Trek movie franchise

No Nimoy no problem, I doubt it would’ve even been back then , just write around it/incorporate it

Dude keep Abrams faaaar away from directing anymore Star Trek. I would think after STID and TROS no one would be begging this guy to make any more of these movies lol. I don’t see your obsession of wanting Abrams back, no one is begging to have him back. I rather they just got someone completely new at this point.

Either way this is all a pipe dream. Orci didn’t quit, by all indications he was fired and they hated his script so much they ordered him to make another one which we know also wasn’t accepted. And we don’t know it was ‘superior’ because no one here has ever read it. Yeah the premise sounds promising, that doesn’t mean it was a good script either.

He did say he would love to adapt it into a novel some day. I think that’s more feasible but it looks like Orci has completely moved on from Trek and I can’t really blame him lol.

Id say the premise alone sounded better than Beyond :) certainly more in tune with previous 2 films (regarding timelines stuff)

A 6 issue comic/graphic novel would be best way to go, but the fact we havent had it yet suggests (maybe) Par a holding on to it to adapt for an eventual movie..(theatre or P+)

By the way, whatever happened to Orci? For some time he was writing and producing so much blockbuster stuff and even coming here to the comments sections from time to time and then he just seemed to have dissappeared after separating from Kurtzman.

Just by coincidence I looked at his IMDB page a week ago and it looks like he has one upcoming movie project coming up, but sounds like a smaller movie and nothing at the Transformers/Spider-Man/Star Trek levels of old.

But yeah I’m curious too. Orci had a huge career not that long ago and not just had a partnership with Kurtzman but also a very good working relationship with Abrams and Bad Robot. You would think he would be be working on other projects with them considering that’s where he did a lot of his work before and during Star Trek, but nothing. I think he just burned a lot of bridges there. But it’s proof Hollywood careers can flame out as fast as they light up. Just like what happened with the Kelvin movies themselves, nothing is ever a guarantee there.

I’ve been a fan of them since the Hercules/Xena days. A big fan of the Bad Robot shows. Loved Transformers Prime. I think Amazing Spider-Man 2 was destroyed in editing. When a bunch of scenes where cut. I think they’ve been given too much crap for that movie, i won’t defend the remake of The Mummy it was awful. Sofia was the only good part.

Before the show ended Sleepy Hollow was one of my all time favorite shows. Loved Alias. Haven’t seen Fringe i’m looking forward to watching all the seasons. Hated the end of Lost, and found the ending of Alias terrible as well. I don’t like Bayformers, the only thing i turned around on my dislike for was the first two Star Trek remakes. The opposite happened for MI 3 i hate it now when i used to love it. I will say Transformers actually got worse without Orci and Kurtzman though. Those Marky movies were awful.

At this point you been getting your wish for seven years and counting lol.

BUT they may still try and make one more but considering how ridiculously hard that has been, then you may get your wish. I personally like the movies but I been wanting them to move on since 2020 now for no other reason they clearly don’t have the money or confidence to make another one and another movie is just being stalled over it. It shouldn’t take this long to make another Star Trek movie and until these movies started, it wasn’t. They had no problem getting 3 more Transformers and Mission Impossible movies made since 2016 while Star Trek stays dead in the water.

Isn’t that what the Orci was going to do – only the jettisoning would have closed the temporal tunnel and along with it the Kelvinverse, making the thing all revert to prime.

I doubt the kelvin timeline would’ve been reset to Prime by the end , more likely Quinto/Pine (and Shatner) would’ve been trying to prevent its erasure (despite Vulcan gone/Spocks mother/Kirks father dead)

Forget the movie and make a ST that takes place in the Kelvin Universe . A show with completely new characters with a ship not named Enterprise.

I can understand this argument due to the creative freedom it comes with. I wonder though how many more Star Trek shows Paramount + can afford to have? I don’t think it’s a coincidence it’s getting rid of Prodigy. Clearly they are having financial issues even if I don’t get all of the nuisances of the business.

We know they have a writer’s room for a Starfleet academy show, a 3rd season of SNW and of course more Lower Decks. Discovery is finishing its 5 year run and that may be it for the company for awhile. Unless they decide to create more shows to sell like they are doing with Prodigy.

But that wouldn’t be Star Trek for a lot of casual fans and these are the people you need to get interested for any show to succeed.

Trek fans love the Kelvin Universe .

Why do you keep putting that in bold?

Also, a ton of fans do NOT love the Kelvin universe.

Obviously not enough to make any real money, that’s the problem. I have no doubt there are still a lot of Kelvin universe fans out there, the problem is can you get enough of them to see it in a theater or will they just wait until it comes home to digital, blu-ray or streaming? Based on what happened with Beyond it’s probably the latter, especially these days.

Star Trek has always done better on TV. Look at SNW and Picard. I don’t think either would be big enough hits if you turned them into movies, but they both thrive on TV or at least streaming.

As far as the Kelvin universe, they should just try and do a streaming mini-series on Paramount+. Or pull a Picard season 3 and make it a big event to end the series if there is no interest for a theatrical movie but want to give them a proper send off. That’s probably more realistic than making another $150 million movie that will probably break even at best. I just don’t see that happening at all anymore.

I’d be very interested in a Kelvin universe based series myself. Kelvin universe got me back into Trek.

Yeah I think those movies got a lot of old fans back into Trek, especially if you weren’t happy with the later TNG films or Enterprise. Unfortunately it wasn’t enough of them to sustain it either.

The Kelvin movies got me back into Star Trek but not the same way as you my friend. After watching the 09 movie and thinking it was SO bad I started watching my TNG/DS9/VOY DVDs again full time and remembered what true Trek stories were like again. By that point I wasn’t watching Trek very much and sporadically.

And it was the 09 movie that convinced me to give Enterprise another chance. That was the year I watched the whole show for the first time because I wanted new Trek and I that’s when I realized that show was pretty awesome lol. Still nowhere close to the 24th century stuff and TOS but good in it’s own right and miles ahead of the Marvel movie in space I watched that summer.

Once I accepted it was in a more primitive time and the Carsassians or the Romulans would never appear on it (although later they did lol) I got into the show. And it’s also where I fell in love with the Andorians and Xindi, who I knew I was going to hate.

So yes the Kelvin movies got me back into Star Trek too! 😁

I did like the Kelvin movies but they prompted me to go back to wade through TOS again which leads me to finally watching DS9 because TOS and I don’t get along very well. (Before anyone says anything, that’s just how I feel about it.)

Wow did you and TOS get into a fight or something? But it lead you to DS9 so JJ verse did something right…for a change.

The only one i regret missing in theaters is 2009. Saw Into Darkness in Imax. Even the home 4K doesn’t come close to that. Beyond i didn’t bother the trailer didn’t interest me at all. I finally saw it on cable, it was very much meh. Very underwhelming. My brother who loved the first two and dragged me to see the second, thought the third was just okay.

Dude, I’ve seen all three Kelvin films TWICE in the theaters. Out of the six watches, I watched them on IMAX four times. I always like to brag to everyone I saw the first Kelvin movie at the opening premiere in Australia with the cast and JJ Abrams (but only people who likes Star Trek cares, so I only brag about it to very few people lol).

And I had problems with all of them frankly for reasons I stated many times and I really didn’t think Abrams was the right guy to make them in terms of Star Trek itself But I still felt they were worth watching in the theater as fun escapist action movies and twice in fact. And I even pulled a few non-Trek friends and family to come watch them with me; at least the first and third movie.

I think some people read my posts when they get discussed and believe I have it out for these movies and I want them to end permanently. No, that couldn’t be farther from the truth. If they make another one, I will happily see it opening weekend too and probably go see it twice as well if it’s entertaining enough. I’m just reading the room at this point and the appetite for them simply isn’t there anymore like it was when STID came out a decade ago (wow). So it’s just time to move on IMO; at least in the theatrical arena and not from the Kelvin universe completely. Paramount SEEMS to know that but probably has no idea what they can replace it with so they are in a holding pattern where to go next.

I don’t really envy them, but it’s also partly their fault too.

Wow that’s way more than me!

I saw the first one twice in the theater. But once with ID and Beyond each. And the only reason why I watched Beyond in the theater because I had a free movie ticket. And the reviews after the week sounded OK. But after STID I swore I would never waste my money on more JJ verse nonsense. And I ended up liking Beyond. But maybe rock bottom low expectations and a free viewing helped! 😂

I’m just curious why do you think it was Paramount fault for them failing? Not disagreeing just curious about your thoughts?

Nothing that hasn’t been said a thousand times in the past, but mostly the waiting gap between the first and second film which cooled the hype a lot, mostly with new fans. The idiotic decision to keep ‘Khan’ a secret in the marketing which one hand built a lot of hype and mystery for the character, but the the immense backlash they got by old fans once it was released was probably not worth it. And then the truly awful marketing of Beyond with that first trailer and what I’m convinced really kept a lot of people away. They wanted it to come off as GOTG as they could and it backfired supremely. But it was badly marketed all around. Some people have argued they knew the movie was going to be a turkey once they projections and probably didn’t care as much.

But the biggest issue is just giving these movies too much money. The first one was fine and in line with most blockbusters. The second one was too much but that was because Abrams went over budget. But they were confident they were probably going to make $600+ million minimum. But once they saw that STID wasn’t going to be the next TDK, then they should’ve curtailed the budget for Beyond by a lot. Even cheaper than the first movie. Not a ton but around $140 million. But I guess because of all the issues over Orci’s movie and rushing the film after being delayed, giving Pine and the cast more money, etc, it just couldn’t be helped. But if they could’ve kept it at $140 million, the movie would’ve been a success and we probably would’ve gotten another years ago. Some people want to raise the next one to $200 million and I just shake my head.

That’s why we still don’t have one today lol, because they over shot the demand. And today it would probably be lower given all the factors that didn’t exist in 2016 and the fact the demand is almost nonexistent today except mostly hardcore fans. The same type of fans who are begging for a season 5 of Enterprise or want a Khan show. (ugh)

So a lot of it was their fault but of course some things just can’t be helped. But a lot of this just came down to overestimating the product they had more than anything. Again Star Trek is a big IP, but it’s just not geared for masses like the others and you have to work with what you have. Why it works so much better on TV.

Well thanks for that and agree with most, especially the first Beyond teaser trailer. Like oh my God? What . were.they.thinking?? And that’s what originally convinced me to skip the movie until I got the free coupon.

But I think a lot of people made up their mind when fratboy Kirk is jumping off motorcycles while more Beastie Boys are playing (IT’S A SAAAAABOTAAAAGE!!!) You certainly got that right Beastie Boys. 🙄 I remember thinking what have they done to Star Trek?? Was Shades of Grey, The Fight, Profit and Lace, The Final Frontier and Nemesis not enough suffering for us? Now you have to pull this bleep too? What have we fans done to deserve this? It’s amazing that movie wasn’t another total dumpster fire, especially after the aptly named Star Trek Into Dumpster fire.

Sorry about the rant. Sometimes you have to let it out. I was just on Reddit going into my annual rant over the Kazon. Bro it’s a species that has warp capable ships BUT COULDN’T FIND WATER???? WHAT THE BLEEP MAN!?!?’

I gotten 20 likes so far. You can’t just ignore the evils of history, you have to confront it head on no matter how painful.

Off to watch an episode of Lower Decks to calm myself down and remember all the good in the galaxy. Tendi is amazing. 🙂

A ton of Star Trek fans love anything that has the words “Star Trek” on it. They people who don’t love the Kelvin universe probably equal the number of people who don’t like this season of Strange New Worlds, so, like three people who can all be ignored forever.

I think you are grossly undercounting our number, for we are legion.

I thought you liked SNW Kmart? Or am I interpreting this sentence wrong?

I loved one ep of s1, liked 2 others.

This season, I only really enjoyed the crossover, though the M’Benga war thing with Robert Wisdom came closest to being okay. It isn’t like DSC, where the show misses so badly that it would make me physically ill to keep watching, but it is still infuriating given the resources and the potential.

I used to think it was partly jealousy over them getting to do this job instead of me, but man, they just ain’t doing it right, not even close.

Wasn’t the Crossover the best man? 🙂 It just fills your heart with tribble tranquility. It’s my favorite of the entire show

Now you mentioned Discovery and now I feel I just been stabbed through the heart by a Mek’leth. And now one of the Discovery Klingons are eating it. How did that show even get on the air?

Getting on the air seems to be equal parts politics and inertia (as in, it was time and then some for trek to return to the small screen), but staying on the air … that’s the real question in my book.

OK thanks for the response. I guess I overestimated how much you liked the show then. But at least you’re still watching it and agreed the crossover episode was great!

I was ready to bow out early but that did give the show a brief reprieve in my mind. My wife, however, is no longer allowing me to mutter during the episodes, saying if I hate them that much I need to watch them alone. I have explained how bitching about a show’s deficiencies is part of my process, going back even before TNG, but I guess unless I’m being very funny (like the ‘Boyce with benefits’ line about Pike’s starship captain squeeze), it comes off too much like sour grapes to her.

Didn’t Bob Orci pitch an Excelsior show with Sulu. John Cho.

There was talk about it, but it didn’t get very far.

I would’ve loved to have seen that!

I thought this was a good idea too and wondered why it never took off. Maybe if that Cowboy Bebop show with Cho had been a success at Netflix there might have been more of a possibility of this happening but as it stands I don’t think Cho ever had a hit show so they don’t think it would be successful with him in the lead.

If not for Viacom and CBS being different entities when Discovery was greenlit, it’s possible that’s the direction they would have taken. There’s really nothing preventing them from doing that now.

I don’t think there was anything preventing them before. That was just a unproven assumption people online made without facts to back it up.

This is based on a conversation with my contact over there. Star Trek was a shared entity but there was a division as it related to Star Trek under Paramount Pictures as a part of Viacom (the feature films) and Star Trek under CBS (all television related properties). The Kelvin films were unique in that they were an entity that fell under the film studio and not shared with the television division.

Yeah it sounds like the studio had direct rights to the movies and trying to make something for TV would’ve been a big hurdle. Plus add to the fact CBS never seemed that interested in the Kelvin movies because they were making their money off the old shows and the Prime universe and where they wanted to keep the attention on as we are seeing now.

That is correct, sir!

When National Amusements split Viacom, Les Moonves was instrumental in how Viacom was to be restructured. When he spoke to the company I worked for some years back, he said he had wanted no part of the film business or cable, preferring to focus on CBS, sports and television production (as well as retaining Simon & Schuster). That impacted Star Trek in a big way, with Paramount Pictures retaining rights to the 10 movies and anything related to them and CBS retaining the rights to all Star Trek television series and anything related to them. Star Trek’s 50th Anniversary was likely a bit anti-climatic as a result of this split, with Star Trek under the control of two separate entities.

“Forget the movie and make a ST that takes place in the  Kelvin Universe . A show with completely new characters with a ship not named Enterprise.”

I think for the first time in years, we fully agree on something lol. Yeah I would be all for this. Keep the Kelvin universe alive, but with new characters and setting. To be honest with you, I’m shocked with ALL the Trek shows out now, this has never been one of them. People were convinced if and when Star Trek would come back to TV, it would solely be in the Kelvin universe. Instead the opposite has happened and it’s been completely ignored for more Prime universe shows.

And of course I get why the focus is back on the Prime universe and never doubted it would be back. But I’m pretty sure if you make a show in the Kelvin universe it would get just as much attention as those shows now and especially by people who become fans of Star Trek due to those movies.

I guess they are scared old fans will riot or boycott P+ over it lol. I really have no idea why this hasn’t at least been considered by now.

A 4th should have happened years ago. The pandemic probably killed plans for a 4th for good. I love the cast. Chris Pine is my favorite of them. I was dead set against him in the beginning, i was wrong. If there is one thing JJ is good at it is casting his Star Trek and Star Wars films.

ST4 can still get a green for go…but it needs to drop the mega budget & go for a more focused tighter character driven story like TWOK or TUC…both made on very low budgets!

Maybe the model should be the Karl Urban DREDD … except that didn’t make enough to justify a sequel either, even though it was a nice compact little flick (one that I keep forgetting exists.)

Agreed but I don’t see these movies ever going that low. They still want the Marvel crowd.

Glad to see the two Spock’s meet. I wish they mind melded each other.

It’s actually pretty cool to see these two guys together! 😎

As far as the creative differences, I think Paramount creatively likes having and earning money and knows another JJ verse movie could kill that prospect fast because a lot of people stopped caring about it long, long ago and afraid it will just bomb.

Trump probably has a better chance of staying out of prison then getting another soulless JJ verse movie.

But wish upon a star, you never know. Miracles can still happen. 😀

A Kelvin film coming in at $100 million would more than make its money back. Before Star Trek ’09 (and after Star Trek: TMP), Star Trek films were modestly budgeted affairs that always turned a profit at the box office (with the exception of “Nemesis” which just managed to break even).

The irony of the Kelvin films is that the third entry earned more at the box office than the first two. This usually serves as an indication that the franchise is moving in the right direction and results in a firm, immediate green light. At the time, however, Paramount was on less than firm footing and in a state of flux. Once Brian Robbins was named head of the studio in 2021, things became much more focused. If another feature film is going to happen, he’ll be the one to make sure that it does and will ensure that all of the principals involved are locked in before an announcement is made at the behest of higher ups.

Where are you getting those numbers? From Box Office Mojo (not the de facto, of course, but fastest I could find):

ST09: $385 mil WW – $150 mil budget = $235 mil before P&A STID: $467 mil WW – $190 mil budget = $277 mil before P&A STB: $343 mil WW – $185 mil budget = $158 mil before P&A

“Hollywood accounting” certainly flips all hits into losses, but even just looking at raw numbers the amount of even profitability after the cost of distributing the movie and advertising it gets called into question with this trio. But if Beyond made more than the rest, I definitely want to see that source.

My post is pending (I provided links) but, yeah, I reversed the numbers!

You seem to have your numbers mixed up. Beyond had the lowest boxoffice take of all three at $343 million. Into Darkness made $467 million worldwide, whereas the first one made $386 million.

Completely mixed them up. My bad!

This is why we get along so well Denny C! :D

Yeah I been saying it for at least 5 years now, make a MUCH smaller movie of around $100 million and you are least guaranteed to make a profit unless the movie just really sucks. But the problem is they know they can’t turn up the ‘spectacle’ with that money and that will turn away the crowds who only show up for these movies for the explosions and big battles. So I get why Paramount is not that excited about a smaller movie because most studios don’t want to just make some money, they want to make a lot of money these days. And with Star Trek that’s never been the case no matter what they do. The mentality of the 80s and 90s are dead.

But that’s probably why the movie slate is in such a stalemate. They probably can’t justify making a super high budget movie anymore, but it doesn’t motivate them to make a more budget one either and here we are.

EDIT: I erased my post over the Beyond numbers now that I see you corrected it.

They had a Noah Hawley movie ready to shoot and they pulled the plug on it late. Conceivably, no rational studio head is handing Noah Hawley a $200 million budget to make a major tentpole, and so it’s logical to conclude *that* movie would’ve been exactly this. There’s still a deep vein of Hollywood idiots who think all pictures have to be tentpoles to justify the expenditure, but also, Paramount probably thinks it’s better off investing in Star Trek on TV given the constant financial failures on the feature side. I think I agree with that assessment, even though a Star Trek movie with Cate Blanchett as Captain, made for under $150 million, would’ve been a financial success.

Hawley’s probably happy with his ALIEN TV series, maybe he can recycle some of the TREK storyline into that.

Out of all the cancelled projects, it was Hawley’s I was most excited about because it sounded like it was going to be all new characters which is what I truly want in the next movie. But yes I ALSO suspect that was so he can just hire cheaper actors as well and keep the budget waaay down compared to the Kelvin movies. It probably was going to be a more stripped down movie which frankly I think most Trek fans would be happy with.

I also think that’s why they were interested in Tarantino. His name alone has a lot of gravitas but I think his most expensive film cost around $100 million and I’m guessing that’s what his Trek movie would’ve cost or at least around there. Especially when it was revealed it was going to be A Piece of the Action rip off so it would mostly be another Earth based time travel movie and not a lot of space battles or foreign planets.

I think TV is where it will stay for a long time to come. I’m guessing Lower Decks budget is so cheap, they can probably make 5 more seasons on just what it cost to pay the Kelvin cast alone.

wild ‘out there’ take..

Kelvin Spock as the surprise cliffhanger at the end of SNW s2?

Yeah…no lol.

Kirk: Spock … you’ve put on weight. Isn’t that my job?

Wow it’s pretty cool the two Spocks finally got to meet in public. A little sad Nimoy couldn’t be there too but still nice. I know he and Quinto became real friends after the first film so I know he has a lot of great memories with them together.

As far as the next movie, I’ve repeated myself enough, but the short version is I think it’s over. I been saying that since 2019 frankly although Paramount keep threatening to prove me wrong, but they haven’t yet lol. Again I don’t mean we’ll never see another movie, I just think it’s probably not feasible for another Kelvin movie at this point.

But I also want to make clear I don’t think the Kelvin universe will disappear into thin air either (as some seem to really want that to happen). I’ve always said it would be nice to give them one last send off if nothing else, but since that’s looking more unlikely as well, that’s why they should look into doing a mini-series of some kind on Paramount+. Just do what Picard season 3 did and make it a big event send off type of thing for these characters. It would get tons of hype over it IMO.

And now we have precedence of turning theatrical movies into streaming mini-series with both Obi Wan Kenobi and the Book of Boboa Fett. Both of those were originally suppose to be standalone movies like what Solo was. Of course Solo bombed so those were cancelled until Disney+ gave them a new life and brought back the original actors as well. They even used the Obi Wan movie script for the show, just expanded it for the show (for better or worse). Now the difference is Disney still spent a ridiculous amount of money on those shows and basically transferred a movie budget to make them. I think they both cost around $200 million. No way does P+ have that kind of money for Star Trek lol, but it’s possible you can make it there, just what the other shows get now which isn’t cheap fare either.

And I just have a feeling for Kelvin universe fans, it’s probably way more likely that universe will show up in streaming in some form instead of a theater again…at least one day.

I think Trek is going the opposite direction a bit though. While franchises like Star Wars and Marvel are turning their movies into miniseries, Trek is turning its series (miniseries) into streaming movies (section 31) The main reason being that Paramount doesn’t have the insane amount of money Disney does.

If they could just make a Kelvin TV movie, that would be fine too obviously. But I still have a feeling they are more invested in TV show based content when you look at Paramount+ original output overall and 90% are TV shows and mini-series. I think they have made 2 or 3 movies so far for that site.

The Section 31 movie seems a bit different because they promised Yeoh a show but when it became obvious that wasn’t going to happen, this become the compromise. That said they did say they plan to make a Trek TV movie every two years but we’ll see. But yeah I don’t see why a Kelvin movie couldn’t be one of them outside of the cast wanting more money. But I think if they are told this is their only option to revisit those characters again, most would do it.

Either way Star Trek’s future is on streaming. I think Trek theatrical movies are based on way too many factors that doesn’t guarantee a reliable or stable output even if they manage to get another one made within the next 5 years.

Could totally see a 70-100m budget Kelvin finale P+ event series (like Pic s3) or P+ movie (like s31) being done at some point maybe the 60th anniversary (also 10th ann of Beyond!).. or maybe part of a crossover event thing that fans will go nuts for ,’Crisis of Infinite Star Treks’

As much as I want to be able to say ‘one to star trek’ again (or more recently selecting on a console in the cinema lobby) I can’t see it happening anytime soon (esp after Indiana Jones and Mission Impossible failed to bring in their usual numbers..)

Yeah this is just more realistic. There is no more buzz or hype to guarantee a movie is going to make a profit, much less be huge. And Paramount isn’t interested in just making a profit, they want these movies to be huge once you spend a certain amount on them.

But a cheaper P+ limited event series for these characters would be easier to justify since it’s also easier to get the casual fans to watch something at home versus the theater, especially these days. Same time I’m not holding my breath that we will ever happen either because none of the higher ups or current producers ever mentions the Kelvin universe and Paramount+ when discussing the future of Trek and potential shows; but I have to think it’s at least feasible.

And if fans start to push for it like they are pushing for the Legacy show, maybe it will happen.

I hold little optimism in a Kelvin Trek IV ever happening. Too much time has gone by. Anton Yelchin’s absence would be glaring. Production costs would be too high for the box office return. Perhaps most of all, it’s clear they don’t have a good script and it’s been 7 flipping years. Shame they wasted such a great cast. Strange New Worlds has nicely filled the void.

I have an idea for the next movie.

It should be TNG…. From the musical universe

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

LOL don’t give them anymore ideas man. ;D

Brent is already gliding down his staircase throwing tissues at the suggestion

MCU and disney in general was shut out of china during covid, not able to release movies there until ‘way of water’ last year so it affected box office for phase 4. but that phase still made nearly $5 billion worldwide.

Ditch Kelvin big budget move and get back to the quality ‘Trek

IMAGES

  1. Zachary Quinto Open To Returning As Spock In Future Star Trek Movies

    star trek movies with zachary quinto

  2. Zachary Quinto as Spock

    star trek movies with zachary quinto

  3. Zachary Quinto as Mr. Spock (Star Trek, 2009) Star Trek 4, Star Trek

    star trek movies with zachary quinto

  4. Star Trek Into Darkness Final Trailer

    star trek movies with zachary quinto

  5. Zachary Quinto shows emotion as Spock in Star Trek Into Darkness

    star trek movies with zachary quinto

  6. Zachary Quinto's Spock Photo: Star Trek Onoing #2

    star trek movies with zachary quinto

VIDEO

  1. New Star Trek 4 Movie Announced with Andor Director Toby Haynes

  2. Star Trek Beyond (2016) Movie WATCH ALONG!

  3. Star Trek Beyond

  4. STAR TREK Bloopers & Gag Reel (2009) with Zoe Saldana, Zachary Quinto & Chris Pine

  5. Star Trek Tribute HD

  6. The Star Trek Movies You Haven't Seen

COMMENTS

  1. Zachary Quinto

    Zachary Quinto. Actor: Star Trek. Zachary Quinto was born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, to Margaret J. (McArdle), an Irish-American office worker, and Joseph John Quinto, an Italian-American barber. Zachary graduated from Central Catholic High School in Pittsburgh, with the class of 1995, where he won Pittsburgh's Gene Kelly Award for Best Supporting Actor for his performance as the Major ...

  2. Zachary Quinto

    Zachary John Quinto (/ ˈ k w ɪ n t oʊ /; born June 2, 1977) is an American actor and film producer.He is known for his roles as Sylar, the primary antagonist from the science fiction drama series Heroes (2006-2010); Spock in the film Star Trek (2009) and its sequels Star Trek Into Darkness (2013) and Star Trek Beyond (2016); Charlie Manx in the AMC series NOS4A2, and Dr. Oliver Thredson ...

  3. Star Trek Into Darkness (2013)

    Star Trek Into Darkness: Directed by J.J. Abrams. With Leonard Nimoy, Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Zoe Saldana. After the crew of the Enterprise find an unstoppable ...

  4. Star Trek (2009)

    Star Trek: Directed by J.J. Abrams. With Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Leonard Nimoy, Eric Bana. The brash James T. Kirk tries to live up to his father's legacy with Mr. Spock keeping him in check as a vengeful Romulan from the future creates black holes to destroy the Federation one planet at a time.

  5. Star Trek Chris Pine Movies In Order

    Star Trek: Chris Pine Movies in Order. When it comes to the Star Trek franchise, one name that stands out is Chris Pine. ... (Zachary Quinto) and the rest of his crew. With its thrilling action sequences and strong character development, this film was a huge success both critically and commercially. 2. Star Trek Into Darkness (2013):

  6. What Zachary Quinto Has Done Since Star Trek Beyond

    Zachary Quinto has been a member of Ryan Murphy's American Horror Story ensemble since 2011.In 2022, six years after Star Trek Beyond was released, Quinto returned to AHS as Sam in the NYC season.It focused on a serial killer operating within New York City's gay community, and Quinto's character was a morally bankrupt art dealer whose pursuit of pleasure through pain blinded him to the torment ...

  7. 'Star Trek' Cast, Including Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto, Returning

    "Star Trek" stars Chris Pine, Zoe Saldana, Zachary Quinto, Karl Urban, John Cho and Simon Pegg have all signed up for a fourth movie. ... I love the 1st two Star Trek reboot movies. I disliked the ...

  8. Zachary Quinto: Mr. Spock And The Boys In The Band : NPR

    Zachary Quinto talks about playing Mr. Spock in the Star Trek films, and the new Netflix adaptation of the play The Boys in the Band. Then, he plays a game about famous Pittsburghers and famous pits.

  9. Zachary Quinto Interview, Part 2

    Zachary Quinto, in part one of our exclusive interview, talked about his first experience playing Spock in Star Trek (2009), about his decision to come out as a gay man, and about his latest film, the thriller Margin Call, which will open on Friday. Today, in the second half of our conversation, Quinto chats more about Margin Call, fills us in on his other upcoming projects, which include a ...

  10. Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto as Starfleet Kids in Space

    Directed by J.J. Abrams. Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi. PG-13. 2h 7m. By Manohla Dargis. May 7, 2009. A bright, shiny blast from a newly imagined past, "Star Trek," the latest spinoff from the ...

  11. 8 Biggest Changes J.J. Abrams' Star Trek Made To Zachary Quinto's Spock

    J.J. Abrams' Star Trek movies changed Zachary Quinto's Spock to make him more relatable to average moviegoers, with a deeper emotional character arc. Spock and Uhura's relationship faced challenges in the rebooted Star Trek films, ultimately leading to their breakup but remaining close friends. Quinto's Spock in the Kelvin Timeline experienced ...

  12. Zachary Quinto Talks Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf and Next Star Trek

    Zachary Quinto, star of L. ... He went on to note that studio movies of the scale of Star Trek often begin in fits and starts, but he's confident the film will happen. The property is a key ...

  13. Zachary Quinto Interview, Part 1

    Zachary Quinto has been in the news the past few days. Perhaps you've heard: Star Trek (2009)'s Mr. Spock has a new movie coming out, called Margin Call, and, very quietly, he just came out, announcing to the world that he is a gay man. StarTrek.com caught up with Quinto for an interview a couple of days after the big announcement. Over the course of the conversation, he shared his ...

  14. Zachary Quinto

    He has since taken on the role of Spock in J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek film series, including 2013's Star Trek Into Darkness. Early Life. Zachary John Quinto was born on June 2, 1977, in ...

  15. Sort by Year

    A deeply repressed man, the uninhibited young man that gives him a happy ending, and all the lives they ruin along the way. Director: Rightor Doyle | Stars: Zachary Quinto, Lukas Gage, Judith Light, Simon Rex. Votes: 2,010. 20. He Went That Way (2023) 95 min | Crime, Drama, Thriller. 5.2. Rate this. 37 Metascore.

  16. Zachary Quinto Open To Returning As Spock In Future Star Trek Movies

    Zachary Quinto says he's open to returning as Spock in future Star Trek movies. Leonard Nimoy of course originated the role of Spock in Star Trek: The Original Series and the first run of Star Trek movies.But Quinto made the role his own when he took on playing the eminently logical Vulcan in J.J. Abrams' 2009 Trek reboot.. That 2009 reboot of course led to a pair of Star Trek sequels, the ...

  17. After Mysterious New Star Trek Movie Is Announced, Zachary Quinto

    With the recent announcement of a mystery Star Trek film, Quinto revealed the original cast's feelings on a sequel. Since the release of Star Trek Beyond , Zachary Quinto and the cast have dealt ...

  18. EXCLUSIVE: Interview with Zachary Quinto

    With his look and a spot on a hit TV show, it was no surprise that after publicly campaigning for the role Zachary Quinto was the first actor cast for the new Star Trek.In our new exclusive ...

  19. Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto And The Crew To Return For A New Star Trek Film

    Now, though it appears to be back on track, with Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Simon Pegg and the rest of the reboot timeline crew in talks to return. JJ Abrams was part of Paramount's big investor ...

  20. STAR TREK 4 Names New Writer for 'Final Chapter' of Series

    That includes getting Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Zoe Saldana, Karl Urban, John Cho, and Simon Pegg to return for Star Trek 4. It was just one of the many major developments to arise out of the ...

  21. Zachary Quinto

    Zachary Quinto. Actor: Star Trek. Zachary Quinto was born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, to Margaret J. (McArdle), an Irish-American office worker, and Joseph John Quinto, an Italian-American barber. Zachary graduated from Central Catholic High School in Pittsburgh, with the class of 1995, where he won Pittsburgh's Gene Kelly Award for Best Supporting Actor for his performance as the Major ...

  22. Spock Actors From J.J. Abrams Movies & Strange New Worlds Unite At Star

    Published Aug 7, 2023. Star Trek's movie Spock, Zachary Quinto, meets Ethan Peck, Strange New Worlds' Spock, for the first time at STLV: 57-Year Mission. Summary. Zachary Quinto and Ethan Peck, who both portray Mr. Spock in Star Trek, met for the first time on stage at a convention in Las Vegas. Scott Mantz, the moderator of the event, shared a ...

  23. Zachary Quinto Says Creative Differences Delaying 'Star Trek 4'; He's

    The gift of Nimoy's friendship. During his panel, Zachary Quinto spoke about his relationship with Leonard Nimoy; the pair formed a bond during the filming of the 2009 Star Trek movie and ...